I have no clue but my Navy friends say it's dead. But Navy trains other countries too, right? I'm curious to know how that will be affected.
"Open a lot of doors": do you mean the ability to select a non-carrier trainer?
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
Flight School backed up
- Thread starter Cowgirl
- Start date
"Open a lot of doors": do you mean the ability to select a non-carrier trainer?
Or split intermediate/advanced syllabi between T-6 and F-18 while DON hurries into a replacement trainer?
At this point, downloading everything to T-6 and moving straight to VFA/VAQ FRS wouldn’t surprise me 😐
Old info. Jets are coming back up.
Some truth. E-2 studs still go hook down in the T-45 until the Hummer gets ILM.
So for forever?
Did it once in a sim then once in the plane.
I loved doing T-34 AOA’s…it just clicked and was fun.
My memory may be off, but I recall that AOA fam flight in the T-34 as a stud to be really underwhelming. Prob bc the IP wasn't that confident, and I was just happy landing that fucker with a flare. 😆
Yeah, I mis-typed...it's not an AOA landing, just an AOA approach, so the landing is relatively benign. If I recall correctly, the FF AOA approach would but you ~80-85 knots (I'd have to check the FTI), so you don't have a ton of energy left in the flare, but the NF AOA was the same speed, so it was a non-event.
Anytime you would land away from home (RDO, CCX, O/I, etc), you'd always leave the flaps up on landings anyway, so on the IP side NF landings were normal landings and FF landings were the rarer occurrence.
I wasn't trying to counter your post, but just relaying my memory of that X in a T-34 as a stud...it was cursory.
You obviously know way more having been an IP.
I remember that flight. I already wanted jets, but that flight was when I started to think I might actually have a shot. Had a lot of fun, and got a 5 on my "precision" landings that day- the only time that happened during Primary that I recall. My question to the instructor was "Why don't we always do it that way?" I don't remember his answer.
Today, I fly AOA-based approaches in virtually every aircraft I fly. It's just easier. If the aircraft requires a Vref computation, I'll obviously do that, but it corresponds to a given AOA, so in a pinch, I'll fly that (e.g. flap failure in a single-pilot business jet). More industry standardization and emphasis on AOA approaches would be good for the pilot community writ large, I think.
Last edited: