As part of this discussion of retired officers and malfeasance, it got me thinking about some hypotheticals that I don't know the answer to.
AFAIK, if you are retired and under the age of 60 you are theoretically subject to recall to AD (WW3 type scenario), and then at age 60 you roll over to the permanent retired list.
In the hypothetical scenario of a retired O-5 that gets charged with robbing a bank let's say, what happens wrt the UCMJ? (I believe the Supreme Court ruled in the last few years that a retired SSgt in Okinawa could not be recalled to AD and subject to the UCMJ after a sexual assault charge while he was a retired civilian). If that's the case or not, does it matter the age (above 60/or below). If not, would there be an administrative mechanism to reduce the rank of said O-5 retired bank robber, even if he couldn't be recalled to AD to face the UCMJ?
Thanks for my TED Talk inquiry.