Voice Operater??
The US got handed a surprise or two over the skies of North Viet Nam when their pilots took on the best the Air Force and Navy threw at them. The NVPAF was still in its infancy as far as a credible fighter force, but began to seriously attrite and force strike packages to jettison their stores thereby getting a mission kill. If their claims are valid, their have considerably more aces than we do.
Point is, if you start believing you won't be challenged and start ignoring the basic skills, you might get surprised. The USAF in particular had deemphasized ACM training partially in belief that the medium range missiles would forestall a merge and due to effort to lower mishaps in training.
@snort: Voice Operator? Not sure the E-2 and/or AWACS controllers would like to be known by that.
Brett327 said:. . My argument wasn't that anyone would be able to sustain a counter air campaign against us, only that establishing air superiority won't necessarily be a walk in the park like Afghanistan/OIF. You can bet that any number of countries would launch everything they had if it came to blows, including Syria, North Korea and Iran - none of which has received significant military assistance since the Cold War. All I'm saying is don't cross A/A off the big list of things to do just yet.
Brett
Catmando said:Well said, Brett.
Original post by Catmando: Even a casual student of Air-to-Air warfare might find the below two websites of some interest. The first is a list of the surprisingly many kills the Iranian Air Force had mostly during the Iraq-Iran war. Of significance is both the total number of kills, but also the particular weapons - long and close range - used (if all the data can be believed.)
http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_210.shtml
This second site gives the Air Order of Battle for North Korea. As you correctly say, if it comes to blows, many countries would not hesitate to throw everything they have at you. BVR quickly vanishes and technological superiority is degraded with multiple enemy numbers and tactics over their own turf, and when you find yourself suddenly surrounded by multiple MiG's.
http://www.scramble.nl/kp.htm (Note: Click on the DPRKAF Order of Battle link on the right side of this page.)
The US got handed a surprise or two over the skies of North Viet Nam when their pilots took on the best the Air Force and Navy threw at them. The NVPAF was still in its infancy as far as a credible fighter force, but began to seriously attrite and force strike packages to jettison their stores thereby getting a mission kill. If their claims are valid, their have considerably more aces than we do.
Point is, if you start believing you won't be challenged and start ignoring the basic skills, you might get surprised. The USAF in particular had deemphasized ACM training partially in belief that the medium range missiles would forestall a merge and due to effort to lower mishaps in training.
QUOTE BlaZe: its not like the old dog-fighting days in WWII.? know the philosophy is something like being able to kill the enemy without them even seeing you.
Yep, in a ideal situation, you'll be directed by digital data link, or voice operator to your A to A target. But, in many situations you'd have to visually ID the bogey which puts you in the WWII scenario. dogfight
@ CORPSviation: Yeah, that's a Piper pic of my Meridian. Thanks.
@snort: Voice Operator? Not sure the E-2 and/or AWACS controllers would like to be known by that.