-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
FY12 STA-21 Applicants
- Thread starter omararw
- Start date
3rdtimer
New Member
I'd say you were right. Good going bro. Although, the designator I'm applying for isn't listed in the table.... that sucks. No HR's this year.
fishandguests
FY12 STA-21 Applicant
The top of the document says:
FY12 SUMMARY OF DESIGNATOR ASSIGNMENTS
(01 OCT 11 – 30 SEP 12)
NROTC/STA-21
And then there is an asterisk next in the column that says *OPNAV STA-21 GOALS which states:
* Per OPNAV N1 ltr 1000 Ser N1/127220 of 5 Nov 10 or fiscal year version applicable at the time
The * would indicate the numbers are from FY10 but the STA-21 Fleet Brief, shows "goals" of 226 and 115 for FY10 and FY11, respectively...
FY12 SUMMARY OF DESIGNATOR ASSIGNMENTS
(01 OCT 11 – 30 SEP 12)
NROTC/STA-21
And then there is an asterisk next in the column that says *OPNAV STA-21 GOALS which states:
* Per OPNAV N1 ltr 1000 Ser N1/127220 of 5 Nov 10 or fiscal year version applicable at the time
The * would indicate the numbers are from FY10 but the STA-21 Fleet Brief, shows "goals" of 226 and 115 for FY10 and FY11, respectively...
Popo Jijo
Primary Complete
Well I hope it is real, but it is hard to say since I can't compare it to what came out last year. I will cross my fingers.
I
Just want to point out that the designator for Intel Officers changed late last year from 1630 to 1830...this document reflects that change..... It may be the real deal.....atleast I hope it is!!!
The CDR on my board which sat the selection board last year said the two major components are the personal statement and CO endorsement which are commonly not written the way the board wants to see them. Most packages focus on how good the candidate is without ever addressing weaknesses. If there is an aspect of your package which is not so hot it needs to be addressed. They like to see that you have identified your weaknesses and what actions you have taken to correct them. This all turns your negatives into positives and further strengthening your package. Another common problem which we have no control over is when CO's rank their candidates. Many times the board gets candidates which are not ranked first at their command and still have out-standings straight down. The CO's need to weight their candidate's scores according to their ranking.
For the actual selection process, the board members are given the packages which have pre-scores based on the contents of the packages. Someone posted the pre-score sheet a few pages ago. The board then goes through all the packages and ranks them.
Thanks.....But that makes me even more nervous!
This document has goals for Oceanography and SWO/ED which were not available in FY10, so hopefully this is real!
Popo Jijo
Primary Complete
That is a good point. I do not see that anywhere on the report. Even if it does take away some of the numbers, 192 is still some awesome news.
timmyhoffa
FY-12 SWO/ED Selectee
Anyone contact P-Cola to see if they are releasing quotas any time soon?
William P. DeSousa
Member
timmyhoffa
FY-12 SWO/ED Selectee
I hate to be negative, but I think the numbers in those reports are actually reflecting people being commissioned during that Fiscal Year from the STA-21 pipeline. That would explain why there are no Core #'s.
William P. DeSousa
Member
The only way to know for sure is to look up one of these letters that the notice references. I agree with you though that would make more sense.