AG_2_1800_hopeful
FY-12 Oceanography Selectee
Question for everybody: What approach will you be taking for your external board? Do you plan to trust your command to set it up for you? Will you be taking the initiative, targeting certain people, and setting it up yourself? If you are doing it yourself how will you go about it? Interested to hear what everybody else will be doing and hopefully some good advice about how.
I want to do it myself (command set it up last time), but I don't quite know how yet....
My two cents as well...
I was selected for Oceano this year and as far as the external boards go... I'll tell you like my STA-21 mentor told me (someone who went thru the enlisted commissioning process so if you don't have a mentor to show you the way... get one)... "go big or go home". This is a competition and you want to do everything you possibly can to stand out among the rest. My Nomination Reveiw Board consisted of 3 CAPT's and a LCDR. The CO of NAVSTA Norfolk, a SWO, and a METOC CAPT. The LCDR was a Deck DIVO. She set-up the SWO and METOC CAPT and my OIC set-up the CO as the chair, but I would have done it myself if they weren't as supportive. That board was the most intimidating thing I have ever done in my entire life... 3 O-6's asking you open ended questions, knowing that there is no right or wrong answer, and that they are critiquing your thought process to situations you have never been in! As the precept states, the more senior the board, the more weight it carries and after seeing the results, I think that holds true. Make sure you go thru the process (talking to their staff) but all you have to do is ask. I would be hard pressed to believe that Senior Officers would not want to have the courtesy of having a hand in the success of thier sailors. Like CHodgkins says... your personal statement goes a LONG way... make it personal. No one walking this earth is perfect and making sure the board knows that you have had ups and downs but have triumphed and learned makes you worth the effort. My LOR's were from not only people I have worked for directly, but people I have supported outside my community. The board can see past a Senators letter unless you have directly worked for them. They need the whole picture of who you are and why you're worth the investment.
I'm not sure how meticulous everyone was with their packages, but I went over mine with a fine-tooth comb. I made sure all documents looked professional, had enclosure numbers on the bottom, were oriented perfectly on the page (which took a lot of time because the evals that you pull from your OMPF look like crap). My mentor sat on the STA-21 board some time ago and said that the competition is so stiff that it can often come down to the small attention-to-detail items like that. I went back and forth with my OIC and parent command over a lot of the things that I wanted submitted. I've been in the Navy over 10 years and submitted things from my first duty station as an Airman... anything that makes you stand out among your peers should go in. Let the board decide if it's relevent or not. At the end of the day, it's YOUR package and yours alone... you're the only one who wants it and will be the only one who gets it!!
Good luck with FY-13 and submit again... make sure you put your status in your personal statement to show the board your perserverance... I would hate to not submit and then be left to wonder... what if?