What model? Our seat are trashed here, torn, lumbar supports missing/fubar, etc.
A couple have been "upgraded" with -s cushions and are better. Not due to design, but new.
I have sat in 1 bird that we bought oregon aero pads for, and it was AWESOME! But they made us take the cushions out.
The one I sat in was a B (USS Princeton), but that was in 1993, so maybe they're all worn out by now. In any case, I don't see why aircraft without ejection seats (to include the T-34, which seats SUCK) don't have more comfortable cushions.
As a sidenote, at the Harrier SSWG a few years ago this subject came up with our seats. Flying 5+ hours strapped to an ejection seat (even one relatively "comfortable" by ejection seat standards like ours) was making guys legs go numb and causing lots of problems (attention drain, stress, physical limitations). Somebody brought up the Oregon Aero pads that "the Hornet guys are using" and got shot in the face.
The pads were depicted in an advertisment for the company as basically "ready for issue" and implied that it was OK to do so. The AMSO at the conference (navy Captain) was adamant that NAVAIR hadn't signed off on any of them, and quite to the contrary, had prohibited them in all TACAIR (including the Hornet) due to testing for seat slap and other aerodynamic issues. More testing and development needed to be done.
We all know that the only way that any of that will happen is with money. The only way money will flow to that is to make it a SOF/Operational necessity issue rather than comfort. He said that as soon as anybody used the word "comfort" the guys recieving the pitch eyes glazed over and the money well dried up. Nobody really cares about comfort.
I have no idea where this stands, but I doubt that anything will happen anytime soon. Get your cheeks in shape and stand by for the pain.
.........well that sure didn't come out sounding too good.