• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Hot new helicopter/rotorcraft news

Yes. I know a few guys back in the 2000’s who wanted to shift to something bigger and fly the -53’s (and now one who went from the CH-47 to V-22’s). A lot of guys got bored with ass-and-trash flights in the -60 jump over to the rescue wings in the air guard. Some went for the QOL that goes with having a commission in the AF, especially basing opportunities, but all had a college degree. None that I know switched to fixed wing, but I guess it is possible. I also imagine that now the army has lengthened its flight obligation to 10 years it happens a lot less.
It opens and closes at times.

I was exploring it to go toward the CV-22 at a time in my career where I could have gotten the Army to let me go, but the AF was closed to new people so ended up missing the wave to jump on.

I do know 2 Army pilots who went to AF fixed wing but both were guard. One ended up in Hawgs only to lose that ticket to RPAs, and the other went to a tanker squadron. They really didn’t do anything different than the average person rushing, they just had some extra proof on their record.
 
Last edited:
Talk about longevity in an airframe. The Chinook soldiers on in production!

Replacing older twin engine Sikorsky CH-53’s. The new 53K appears, at 88,000 lbs, to be just too big (and expensive) for most nations while the 55,000 lb Chinook seems to be right sized - and with a much larger support base.

Sikorsky is really having problems: S-76, S-92 and H-53 not selling well and the Blackhawk now being replaced by Bell’s tilt-rotor.
 
Replacing older twin engine Sikorsky CH-53’s. The new 53K appears, at 88,000 lbs, to be just too big (and expensive) for most nations while the 55,000 lb Chinook seems to be right sized - and with a much larger support base.

Sikorsky is really having problems: S-76, S-92 and H-53 not selling well and the Blackhawk now being replaced by Bell’s tilt-rotor.
Leonardo is eating everyone's lunch with respect to traditional helicopters.
 
Replacing older twin engine Sikorsky CH-53’s. The new 53K appears, at 88,000 lbs, to be just too big (and expensive) for most nations while the 55,000 lb Chinook seems to be right sized - and with a much larger support base.

Sikorsky is really having problems: S-76, S-92 and H-53 not selling well and the Blackhawk now being replaced by Bell’s tilt-rotor.
Maybe they should pull something off the boards for a light turbine training helicopter?
 
Leonardo is eating everyone's lunch with respect to traditional helicopters.
Maybe in the medium twin segment with the AW-139, but I would wager Airbus is selling the most in the light twin / single market.

Norway just gave up on the NH90 and appears to be buying Blackhawks.

 
Back
Top