Gills
New Member
I got a very interesting call from my OR today. This weekend I was very busy commiserating and trying to think of reasons why I was not selected for SWO, since my recruiter and I thought I was a shoe in (pun intended).
My OR called and talked to the program manager to see if he could get gouge on why myself and some other good SWO candidates were not selected. There are two possibilities. One, I am also up for INTEL next month and my OR says that I could have been "earmarked." Which means that they told SWO not to select me because they wanted me. This is unlikely because INTEL normally selects very few people. However, I can say that I did have a interview and LOR from an INTEL Rear Admiral who did say that he would "strongly reccommend" me. Also INTEL already contacted my OR and made me send them a letter confirming that I actually wanted INTEL because I guess there was some confusion about that on my initial application. The whole "earmarking" thing is all speculation, but it sure does get me thinking!
Second (more likely) possibility is that the 50 apps per board thing
f*cked me once again. My OR said that they decided to do away with the 50 apps per board mid month, so there were about 165 SWO applicants that they looked at with 50 percent being approved. He said normally its (70-80). We we're still surprised that I was not among those 50%, but whatever.
So, if I do not get selected in February for INTEL, I will most definitley resubmit SWO for the March boards and we think that I should be selected. I'm also going to put up my PRT because according to my own calculations I'll be somewhere in the "Outstanding" range, which has got to count for something.
Sorry for the long rant, I just thought that this was a very interesting situation. And it is encouraging information for me and my quest to become a navy officer.
Good Luck January guys (and gals), I hope your final selects come soon. And I too will be saying "Pro-Rec" one day soon, so watch out!
My OR called and talked to the program manager to see if he could get gouge on why myself and some other good SWO candidates were not selected. There are two possibilities. One, I am also up for INTEL next month and my OR says that I could have been "earmarked." Which means that they told SWO not to select me because they wanted me. This is unlikely because INTEL normally selects very few people. However, I can say that I did have a interview and LOR from an INTEL Rear Admiral who did say that he would "strongly reccommend" me. Also INTEL already contacted my OR and made me send them a letter confirming that I actually wanted INTEL because I guess there was some confusion about that on my initial application. The whole "earmarking" thing is all speculation, but it sure does get me thinking!
Second (more likely) possibility is that the 50 apps per board thing
f*cked me once again. My OR said that they decided to do away with the 50 apps per board mid month, so there were about 165 SWO applicants that they looked at with 50 percent being approved. He said normally its (70-80). We we're still surprised that I was not among those 50%, but whatever.
So, if I do not get selected in February for INTEL, I will most definitley resubmit SWO for the March boards and we think that I should be selected. I'm also going to put up my PRT because according to my own calculations I'll be somewhere in the "Outstanding" range, which has got to count for something.
Sorry for the long rant, I just thought that this was a very interesting situation. And it is encouraging information for me and my quest to become a navy officer.
Good Luck January guys (and gals), I hope your final selects come soon. And I too will be saying "Pro-Rec" one day soon, so watch out!