Im guessing the cancellation on the July board is due to quotas or budget? Im not quite sure how this works if the Sept board is just going to have twice the applicants which in turn would have twice the slots to fill. Any ideas RUFiO101?
I spoke briefly with the community manager for AMDO (which was also cancelled and rolled to February) and he stated there was not enough quotas to hold a board. Assuming here but it's safe to say that is the reason the IDC board got rolled. Benefits of the roll.... It is the first board for the FY-15 picks. They have their 'goal' for the FY and were in the front running to fill it.
So the OPNAV instruction for board convening and business rules states that for every 20(ish) quotas your given, you convene one board. Not sure what this means for the IDC community (outside of not having the required open spots to hold the summer board for the remaining FY-14 picks/start of FY-15) but for trending purposes and example, AMDO has a goal of about 13 per FY. They are scheduled for two boards from the start and have cancelled the second summer board for the past three years.
How do my chances look with 59 OAR, 3.95 GPA BA in History, non-prior, and Russian proficiency...? A little dismayed by the July cancellation and low selection rates.
The Sept board is not the first board for FY15 picks, that was April, well kinda, there are December picks still waiting for OCS dates and they will be FY15 as well.
Oops! I was going off the new FY15 CNRC calendar. Looking back at 2014 I see that they started in February (sorry everyone). This will be the first board with their known / approved FY-15 goal numbers, right? In my failed attempt to call Millington and get an idea of what the numbers will look like, I have been told no one will know until late August. They trend year to year and I don't expect them to deviate from the norm this upcoming fiscal.
well, chances are not good, prior services goes a long way, so does tech degree, a graduate degree, etc. The one thing you do have going for you is a stellar GPA.
If you really want to be a USN officer apply for a designator that has high selection chances.
Strongly recommend take SWO and GO! Being non-prior without extensive Intel experience... your chances are very minimal. If you opt to wait for the Intel board then non-select there, you'll have lost significant time, and your SWO spot will have gone to another. "A bird in hand, etc.,etc....!"Thanks for the response, Sir. I received a pro-rec Y for SWO and am considering accepting that offer now rather than waiting 3+ months to find out about Intel.
You should get an e-mail letting you know they processed your package. If you didn't receive one I would call. I been hearing too many people thinking there package was processed and then when board results come out they said they never got it or was not processed due to something.
I did call and they had put eyes on my package. I had some follow up questions and called again six hours later and got a different processor. He asked for my name and did not "see anything" from me. I also asked if I would get an E-mail stating everything was good to go... The reply was "if you don't hear from us, it's a good thing" and that an E-mail will not be sent unless there was an issue with my package. I'd hate to call again. I guess I have to.
Thanks for the info. Instead of calling I E-mailed. Not sure which one would P them off more. I imagine they are back logged from the holiday weekend. My most recent call was not pleasant; hostile tone and an overall felling I was being a bother.This sounds about right. In my experience, I submitted my package and got an email from NRD saying I was missing parts 2 and 3 of my joint service transcripts. All I had to do was email them those docs in .PDF format. After that it was quiet again. So I called a few weeks later to make sure everything was on track. No news is good news in this case.
How do my chances look with 59 OAR, 3.95 GPA BA in History, non-prior, and Russian proficiency...? A little dismayed by the July cancellation and low selection rates.