You can get a free WaPo account if you sign up with a .mil email. It’s one of the better papers out there.Fucking paywall…
You can get a free WaPo account if you sign up with a .mil email. It’s one of the better papers out there.Fucking paywall…
That’s one technique.Did you just say Brave?
Here's a non-sequitur from the world of social media, Book of WTF, Volume 2020, Florida section:
View attachment 32454
Did you just say Brave?
I have a feeling that the Taliban is reaching for legitimacy and have, in fact, taken. Panjshir city like Rokhah, but they haven’t secured anything.How prisoner releases bolstered the Taliban to victory
Former prisoners like Hafizdullah have become a more common presence in the country.nypost.comInteresting facets to the 2021 downfall of Afghanistan. Needs more corroboration.Did Pakistan Help Taliban by Carrying Out Drone Strikes in Panjshir Valley?
Reports have emerged that Pakistan dropped bombs via drones to help Taliban in Panjshir Valley but the militant group has claimed that no such drone strikes were conducted by Pakistan.www.ibtimes.sg
Obama's increased use of UAV strikes was in large part not wanting to take prisoners'. Prisoners complicated his intention to empty Gitmo or worry about an "ally" having them escape from their prison. It increased collateral damage, and decreased humint from interrogations....Obama's liberal use of drone strikes largely went under the radar. I wonder how many people know that the vast majority of civilian casualties from drone strikes occured on his watch.
Civilian Voters: "We won't tolerate another 9/11! You have to stop the terrorists by any means necessary! And by any means, we mean any means that don't involve Boots On the Ground™. Because the news reporter and my college professor told me that Boots On the Ground™ are evil and bad. Because that means we have a Quagmire Forever War™."I kind of find it ironic that the general population associates Dems with 'doves.' However, Obama's liberal use of drone strikes largely went under the radar. I wonder how many people know that the vast majority of civilian casualties from drone strikes occured on his watch.
Trump escalated the drone strikes, while "unleashing" the commands with broader permissions on when to take the shot. They were very tight under Obama, as far as guaranteeing who the target was and getting permission. And they work.I kind of find it ironic that the general population associates Dems with 'doves.' However, Obama's liberal use of drone strikes largely went under the radar. I wonder how many people know that the vast majority of civilian casualties from drone strikes occurred on his watch.
What I find fascinating was the 1993 WTC bombing was actually worse than the 9/11 bombing in terms of goals and potential outcomes. I doubt Al Qaeda thought they could bring down the whole tower on 9/11, but in 1993 they were going for it all. If it had worked in 1993, the entire tower would have come down with zero escapes by anyone. Orders of magnitude higher death toll in the tower itself and in the surrounding buildings.Civilians: "We won't tolerate another 9/11!
Because why would we have gone to war over a hypothetical? The tower didn't come down, so it ended up not being any different than any of the other relatively low-level car bombings or other terrorist randomness that went on throughout the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s.But the 1993 bombing didn't bring down the tower. So...no harm/no foul?
Why didn't that merit the response that 9/11 did? If the goal was just to prevent another attack? Obviously it wasn't just that.