It seems that everyone on this forum is extremely devoted to Navy and/or Marines aviation. But, if you all are so devoted, then can you explain why you love the Navy or Marines much more than Air Force aviation?
First, this topic has been covered before. If you do a search you will find several threads on the topic.
To seriously answer your question.........The Navy and Marines give their Naval Aviators and Naval Flight Officers much more responsibility much earlier in their careers than the USAF. This translates into much more important decision-making at a much lower level as well as fewer restricitons on what we can do, when we can do it and how we fly it than the USAF.
The best example from personal experience that I can think of that shows the difference is that when I was in EP-3's I was a Mission Commander on my last deployment to the Middle East. I was responsible getting our missions done and I had the freedom to decide on how best to accomplish them, all the while in charge of 23 other aircrew, officer and enlisted. And this was the for the only EP-3 in theater. I had just over 4 years in the Navy, just 2 years in the squadron, and I was barely an O-3. This was not unusual, it was the norm in my squadron.
In contrast, the USAF the mission commanders on large aircraft are usually O-4's or O-5's, occasionally very senior O-3's with 8-10 years in, and they are don't have control over how to best accomplish the mission. They are usually told very specifically how to do their mission by the squadron commander, sometimes for just one plane deployed to a theater.
I have repeatedly heard a saying that best describes the difference n Navy and Air Force flying "The Air Force has rules for what you can do, the Navy has rules on what you can't do."