sh89
Registered User
VetteMuscle427 said:Air defense against WHAT?
Guatemalan invasion?
VetteMuscle427 said:Air defense against WHAT?
VetteMuscle427 said:I have read that book many times... and I find it hard to believe that the Mexicans would spend ALL that money on SU-27s to knock a small unarmed drug runner out of the sky....
They have F-5s... those would be more than enough to do the job. So would any of their H-60s armed with crew served weapons...
Not that I think they would even have the cajones to actually engage a drug runner...
Why do they need a carrier to operate their Flankers?Super Hornet 88 said:Hmmm... Mexico seems to have a bunch of money on their hands. And having the Flankers be part of the Navy? It doesn't make any sense, heck they don't even have an aircraft carrier to begin with!
Yea, it's called a subscription.zab1001 said:I'm quickly beginning to think we need an age/experience filter for each thread. Ah to dream...
If John made people subscribe to this forum (except winged aviators and me of course ), then that might dissuade some folks from going through the trouble of posting the crazy stuff that many of us raise an eyebrow too and say WTF?zab1001 said:I'm honestly not sure what you mean...
Mexico has an armed force? When did this happen?zab1001 said:Gotcha. Now back to "random musings on the Mexican armed forces".
Steve Wilkins said:If John made people subscribe to this forum (except winged aviators and me of course ), then that might dissuade some folks from going through the trouble of posting the crazy stuff that many of us raise an eyebrow too and say WTF?
Steve Wilkins said:Mexico has an armed force? When did this happen?
zab1001 said:I'm quickly beginning to think we need an age/experience filter for each thread. Ah to dream...