• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

NEWS Navy Advanced Multi Engine Trainer Replacement

Somewhat related to this thread, had a Boeing exec at out school so asked if they plan on pursuing the $1.5 Billion contract the Navy is asking for funding for a replacement for the F18 in the 2030s. Got a very non answer of "Boeing pursues all contracts but has the personnel in place from the F18 project and would like to pick up where the F18 leaves off".

So yea no real answer but still kinda interesting.
 

ChuckMK23

FERS and TSP contributor!
pilot
Looks like first delivery to Corpus happened yesterday!

439689994_122139140960173621_7902358768411670318_n.jpg
 

FLGUY

“Technique only”
pilot
Contributor
You know what’s funny? After talking to the METS guys, apparently the max gross weight of the T-54 is 12,500 pounds. AKA the highest weight it could possibly be without warranting a type rating.

The perception is that the Navy hates allowing its pilots to get type ratings. The P-8 isn’t “737 enough” to warrant a type, and the T-54 is one pound under the limit. 😔
 

Swanee

Cereal Killer
pilot
None
Contributor
You know what’s funny? After talking to the METS guys, apparently the max gross weight of the T-54 is 12,500 pounds. AKA the highest weight it could possibly be without warranting a type rating.

The perception is that the Navy hates allowing its pilots to get type ratings. The P-8 isn’t “737 enough” to warrant a type, and the T-54 is one pound under the limit. 😔

Yet the Air Force had no problem with their T-1 guys getting Beechjet/Hawker 400A type ratings.
 

zippy

Freedom!
pilot
Contributor
You know what’s funny? After talking to the METS guys, apparently the max gross weight of the T-54 is 12,500 pounds. AKA the highest weight it could possibly be without warranting a type rating.

The perception is that the Navy hates allowing its pilots to get type ratings. The P-8 isn’t “737 enough” to warrant a type, and the T-54 is one pound under the limit. 😔

In its defense, Navy didn’t set the MTOW weight of the T-54A to 12,500LBs. The King Air 260 MTOW is set/certified by Beechcraft.
The King Air 360 has a MTOW that requires a type rating but it’s overkill for training and isn’t even offered for sale as a Special Mission Aircraft solution for the activity.



 

FLGUY

“Technique only”
pilot
Contributor
In its defense, Navy didn’t set the MTOW weight of the T-54A to 12,500LBs. The King Air 260 MTOW is set/certified by Beechcraft.
The King Air 360 has a MTOW that requires a type rating but it’s overkill for training and isn’t even offered for sale as a Special Mission Aircraft solution for the activity.




Hey don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story ;)
 

hookskip

Member
pilot
You know what’s funny? After talking to the METS guys, apparently the max gross weight of the T-54 is 12,500 pounds. AKA the highest weight it could possibly be without warranting a type rating.

The perception is that the Navy hates allowing its pilots to get type ratings. The P-8 isn’t “737 enough” to warrant a type, and the T-54 is one pound under the limit. 😔
To be eligible for a civilian type rating there has to be an equivalent type. The P-8 is built on a -800 fuselage but with -900 wings. Not to mention the torpedo bay.
 

FLGUY

“Technique only”
pilot
Contributor
To be eligible for a civilian type rating there has to be an equivalent type. The P-8 is built on a -800 fuselage but with -900 wings. Not to mention the torpedo bay.
Right, but plenty of military aircraft are worthy of a civilian equivalent type despite having modifications. For example: the KC-135 warranting a 707 type.

And still, the 737-800 and -900 both fall under the 737NG, so I never understood the reasoning for the wings/fuselage combination of the P-8 being a contributing factor.
 
Top