Yes.What's the reason for flying home with the CATM? Just easier than putting it back in its box and loading it on the trailer?
Some flavor AGM-88. HARM or AARGM, not sure which from the photo. Standard fare for the G bubbas.Is that a CATM version of an AMRAAM?
99% sure it’s an AARGM, they look like they have the ceramic radome, plus there’s no utility in a Growler carrying a HARM CATM as everything HARM related can be simulated in the jet (unless carrying the HARM CATM to check the T&R box is still a thing).Some flavor AGM-88. HARM or AARGM, not sure which from the photo. Standard fare for the G bubbas.
What makes you think it’s a CATM? 😉Is that a CATM version of an AMRAAM?
The big blue stripe 😉What makes you think it’s a CATM? 😉
NERD!!!The big blue stripe 😉
Dumb helo guy - I would have no idea.What makes you think it’s a CATM? 😉
FIFY 😜 Plenty of helo guys know about CATMs.Dumb ass-n-trash helo guy - I would have no idea.
Sorry, no idea. My best guess is "maritime dominance" was the chosen theme for a series of social posts, and no one told the 21-yo contractor responsible for social that USAF isn't maritime.Guys - I do not understand this post by NAVAIR highlighting USAF CV,-22 as an example of maritime dominance
Perhaps @IKE has insight?
Yep, new Navy PAOs are clueless. But, hey, it sounds good. 🤣Sorry, no idea. My best guess is "maritime dominance" was the chosen theme for a series of social posts, and no one told the 21-yo contractor responsible for social that USAF isn't maritime.