exNavyOffRec
Well-Known Member
I would think in a city setting that they would get training on working together, many years ago my training was all about "you are on your own" I was in a rural county, it was not uncommon to be 20 plus miles between me and my backup via 2 lane county roads, often backup was in the form of an off-duty deputy who lived close to where you were. It was made clear that if you were in a fight and he was going for your gun that one option was holding onto your primary with one hand while pulling out your backup to shoot the suspect. The nice thing is that in 2 years I was there we never had an officer involved shooting, or an officer involved fight, any situation was able to be de-escalated by either talking or the suspect realizing when the other officers arrived there was no other option but to give up.Interesting- is there any numbers that normalize this kind of data? Do you care to expound more?
I'm also interested in how police work together? Everyone here has kind of said, "Well, all bets are off when you're in a scuffle" but isn't that like saying, "All bets are off when you're BFMing?" We still practice as a team so we know what to do, and so we make 1+1 = at least 2, if not more.
In this scenario did 1+1 = <1?
And I'm not saying it was their fault. If they aren't frequently trained to a measurable standard you can't expect someone to perform in the field. That's a systemic fault that failed these guys and could have led to the shooting. (My ASO had again...)
I did ride as the second in a 2 man car sometimes, we basically talked through how we would do things, but it was not formal training, and when I did ride as the second it was always with the same deputy as we knew how each other would react.