No need to nerd-splain it to me, Von Braun Jr. I've got KSP:Imagine Earth's orbit. Then imagine Mars's orbit. Assuming the final burn goes well (which should be soon), it'll end up in an orbit where the highest point (relative to the Sun) touches Mars' orbit, and the lowest point touches Earth's. Basically, the last burn makes the rocket go faster than Earth, which elevates the highest point it can reach up to touch Mars' orbit, and then the Sun's gravity takes over and pulls it back down. At which point the Earth is somewhere else, because it's been going faster.
It'd need another burn (the second half of the Hohmann Transfer) near Mars to drop into Mars orbit, which was never the point of the whole thing anyway. They'd have had to wait until Mars was in position to catch up to where the rocket would be when the rocket got there. Interplanetary transfer orbits are basically like taking a guns shot. Match planes with the target and lead it.
In which case all nerd jokes boomerang right back at you, too . . .No need to nerd-splain it to me, Von Braun Jr. I've got KSP:
I can't tell if they meant to do that or not. My guess is probably not since they originally talked about bouncing between an Earth/Mars orbit. But I don't think they care at this point. They got a freaking car into space.
I can't tell if they meant to do that or not. My guess is probably not since they originally talked about bouncing between an Earth/Mars orbit. But I don't think they care at this point. They got a freaking car into space.
If you ever wanted to understand space flight, KSP is an amazing game. I learned more playing that game in a few hours than I did in my college orbital dynamics class.
If you ever wanted to understand space flight, KSP is an amazing game. I learned more playing that game in a few hours than I did in my college orbital dynamics class.
Anyone able to translate FAA speak? Is this a big nothing or does SpaceX have an FAA problem?