HercDriver,
I respect your optimism and all when it comes to health care, but if you have had to deal with any type of long term or dibilitating (controversial) medical treatments within the military, you would not want anymore government control.
"And having medical records on an electronic database is projected to save billions every year in duplicate records and ease of use, improve a physician's access to critical information, reduce the variabilty of care and a host of other things."
-The military went to electronic years ago, now you have to have a paper copy for the records department, online, and your own personal copy for when they lose everything. Also I want doctors to be able to think for themselves. The CDC, IDSA, and other medical agencies make reccomendations for doctors to follow. I don't want someone forcing them to follow certain procedures. Let us think for ourselves.
"I don't know. It will save money overall, get the medical records field to enter the modern era (good by triplicate!), and make it easier for my doc to see all of my medical history quickly. This almost seems like a (wait for it, wait for it)...
Good Idea!"
-I recieve care outside the military hospitals and update them on my medical situation. Any idea how much they care about my medical history? Zero. Why? Because I have a doctor treating me for a condition they don't believe I have (test positive, family history, and all the symptoms) and refuse to listen to any new school of thought that has not been reccomended by the Center for Disease Control and the Infectious Disease Society of America.
-Less government control is better, especially within the health care field.