Your DH needs to know this yesterday (if they don't already). And I'd also argue that you and your DH need to have a sit-down with the CMC about this. I'm not there, but what you are describing sounds perilously close to dereliction of duty. If a Chief is "flat out" telling a commissioned officer they have no interest in performing things directly related to their job . . . that's unsat, and needs to be stomped out ASAP.He goes on terminal in less than 4 months and has flat out said he has no interest in/willingness to learning / relearning Sked 3.2 / OMMG-NG, or getting all of his various permissions set up on the ship to be involved in anything even as simple as a leave chit, or qualifying / re-qualifying in anything.
There are two problems here. First is that you as a JO need help/mentorship running your division. The second, more serious, problem is a CPO willfully disregarding accepted standards of professional conduct for CPOs and flaunting that to a commissioned officer. That diminishes the credibility of all the khaki in your unit if it's perceived to be tolerated. Best case scenario for this individual as I see it is a one-way conversation with the CMC, for starters.
As a commissioned officer, your Chief can't "tell you" they're going to gaff things off like that. Short-timer or no, rank is rank. Respect for and deference to a CPOs' professional expertise is one thing. But if the Chiefs' mess or any member of it thinks that they can dictate to a commissioned officer (even the JORG, as you shoes call them), that is something which has to be crushed swiftly and painfully for the sake of good order and discipline.