I think McCain lost big time on the economics/tax portion of the debate; he seriously needs to bone up on that issue. On the foreign policy portion, I thought he out-debated Obama fine. But the thing is, is that the economy is on everyone's mind as of late, so that is an important issue.
McCain also should have specified exactly why he went to Washington and how Senator Obama was supporting a plan that, how it is written right now, would be a huge cheat on the American taxpayer. There is already corruption in it, as there is a provision for ACORN in the bill.
I have read somewhere (although I don't have the link) that historically, if the Democratic candidate was not ahead of the Republican candidate by at least ten to fifteen points in the polls by the end of August, that they have never won the Presidential election, so I am hoping that holds true.
McCain also should have specified exactly why he went to Washington and how Senator Obama was supporting a plan that, how it is written right now, would be a huge cheat on the American taxpayer. There is already corruption in it, as there is a provision for ACORN in the bill.
I have read somewhere (although I don't have the link) that historically, if the Democratic candidate was not ahead of the Republican candidate by at least ten to fifteen points in the polls by the end of August, that they have never won the Presidential election, so I am hoping that holds true.