Not trying to be a sea lion. Nor any troll. And of course I will be civil, I am just a guest here, plus that is my general Internet behavior.
Not trying to be a sea lion. Nor any troll. And of course I will be civil, I am just a guest here, plus that is my general Internet behavior.
Neither are sea lions, the point is no one gives a shit.Not trying to be a sea lion.
Embrace your inner pinniped, shipmate. Just be yourself. We’ll cope.Not trying to be a sea lion. Nor any troll. And of course I will be civil, I am just a guest here, plus that is my general Internet behavior.
Magnificent. The achievements of Mr. Musk are just remarkable - despite what you may think of him, he and his ideas are the most important developments in a century.
From what I understand, this type of recovery allows them to reduce the weight of the rocket because it won't need "landing gear" as it will instead land at this special docking facility. I believe this is the lower half of the rocket that will come back to Earth while the second half goes into space to do or go wherever.One thing I haven’t been clear on - what’s the technical advantage of doing a recovery like this vs the tail-sitting booster fly backs they’ve been doing? There must be, given the difficulties/costs associated.
Is landing a booster that deploys legs at a precise location on a barge to keep it from falling over fundamentally different than landing a booster at a precise location where it engages a functionally equivalent mechanism to keep it from falling over? Definitely cool to watch, but I'm trying to understand exactly how groundbreaking this actually is, and I'm coming up short. Orgasmic fan bois notwithstanding, I'm not sure this is tantamount the the Moon landing.Magnificent. The achievements of Mr. Musk are just remarkable - despite what you may think of him, he and his ideas are the most important developments in a century.
I was wondering this too. I presume that putting landing legs on the Starship Booster comes at some performance cost.One thing I haven’t been clear on - what’s the technical advantage of doing a recovery like this vs the tail-sitting booster fly backs they’ve been doing? There must be, given the difficulties/costs associated.
Is landing a booster that deploys legs at a precise location on a barge to keep it from falling over fundamentally different than landing a booster at a precise location where it engages a functionally equivalent mechanism to keep it from falling over? Definitely cool to watch, but I'm trying to understand exactly how groundbreaking this actually is, and I'm coming up short. Orgasmic fan bois notwithstanding, I'm not sure this is tantamount the the Moon landing.