Just curious, but what do you mean about the last few months?This is a smart move from a CO with a ship in the yards - especially considering the last few months.
Iwo Jima CO took his 700-man crew for a âTop Gun: Maverickâ movie night, popcorn included
Capt. Judd Krier took almost his entire crew of 700 shipmates to the movie last month.www.navytimes.com
-
Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?
Go here:
Edit Account Details and Profile
Top Gun 2
- Thread starter danpass
- Start date
Best comic strip ever!
It's an antique, but it still has far more screen presence than the F/A-18 IMO. Also, they could have given it new engines, avionics, etc...no reason it couldn't have modern variants of all those things. My (albeit amateur) understanding of why they retired it is because it was a maintenance hog and also the primary role it was designed for became obsolete with the fall of the Soviet Union.Disagree.It's a tired antique, which I feel was adequately conveyed in the film... the 1970s cockpit, the fucking huffer start. I'm glad they included that.
But even if it was a complete piece of crap as an airplane, it still is one of the best looking ever made IMO!
Define "screen presence." I dunno about you, but 98% of the flying shots in this film were of the Rhino, and those were all pretty bad assed. Also, would you be interested in owning a model T Ford equipped with Tesla hands free driving capabilities? Granted, you and your family are going to feel every single defect in the road, because the model T really doesn't have a suspension to speak of, and the brakes aren't effective at all in wet weather.
This trope that we could have just strapped on better X, Y, or Z capability on a 35 year old airframe is asinine. If the F-14 was used today in a fight against China, it would be the very first thing shot down. No amount of upgraded sensors or weapons is going to get past the fact that it has an RCS the size of a barn door. It was a great jet in its time. Let's please stop pretending that it was ever capable of becoming anything more than that.
The “we-didn’t-really-design-H60-to-be-this-hefty” MH-60R seems to be doing okay.
You realize that this is just a movie, right?
Oh, you're getting shot down even before the F-14 in this scenario.
"Screen presence," i.e. looks far cooler and more commanding. The Rhino may be superior but it just doesn't have the commanding presence, IMO.
As for upgrading the F-14, that kind of depends on what one means. The Rhino is almost a different aircraft altogether from the original F/A-18, and similarly with the F-14, there were proposals for a variant that looked the same, but otherwise was basically an entirely new aircraft, with new airframe and all-new systems. One benefit it would have over the Rhino in particular is significantly longer range and faster speed. Also they continue to upgrade the F-15 and F-16.
As for stealth, I would think the Chinese could probably shoot down Rhinos as easily as F-14s with the radars in existence today, but of course correct me if wrong.
Last edited:
I will say was very sad seeing Val Kilmer having been reduced to such a shell of the man he was in the original film. The cancer has really done a number on him 
Oh, he will, just not in a manner you might not appreciate.
Last edited:
Even easier, since there are 0 flying F-14s on our side.