Do a Twitter search of 'Project Blue Beam drones'.Some of the replies to that post are just out of this world stupid.
Then look up Project Blue Beam'.
It's bananas!
Do a Twitter search of 'Project Blue Beam drones'.Some of the replies to that post are just out of this world stupid.
I'm having a difficult time assessing whether he is simply punch drunk, stoned, congenitally stupid, or a combination of all three.Joe Rogan has weighed in
One of the challenges in dealing with small UAS is the diversity of different types/sizes/operating frequency/etc. We have two types of counter UAS at my installation. These systems provide electronic surveillance/geolocation (is a known drone signal present), and an electronic attack capability to either disable or take control of certain kinds of UAS. These are library based systems, so they're great for handling commercial DJI UAS, and we can even look up the owner's registration, etc, but they wouldn't be very effective against a military type UAS.15 minute listen. Very interesting.
I KNEW it !!!!! Traitor !!!!!!!!One of the challenges in dealing with small UAS is the diversity of different types/sizes/operating frequency/etc. We have two types of counter UAS at my installation. These systems provide electronic surveillance/geolocation (is a known drone signal present), and an electronic attack capability to either disable or take control of certain kinds of UAS. These are library based systems, so they're great for handling commercial DJI UAS, and we can even look up the owner's registration, etc, but they wouldn't be very effective against a military type UAS.
Most of what we see are randos flying their DJIs in the nearby state park, and as a DJI owner myself, you have to jump through a lot of hoops to even fly near the Class D airspace here. The device just won't let you do it. Conventional wisdom is that an adversary doing surveillance would use a DJI (easy, plausible deniability, etc), but I'm sure there are some bespoke devices out there being used that won't even show up on most counter-UAS systems. Sounds like the guy at Langley is seeing a combination of those.
I have the authority to engage/bring down any UAS that crosses the installation perimeter, though the law is technically still a bit ambiguous and the FAA still views such actions as "interfering with the operation of an aircraft," which is a felony. DoD and FAA are working on some new language to address this. Bottom line, we don't have a lot of effective solutions for small UAS right now.
Concur with this. I direct the funding and approve the ops for counter sUAS ops at a number of AF installations. It's a big lift and exercised seriously. Its impressive to see AF security forces at work with their counter sUAS tools. The challenge currently I think now is defending against scale.One of the challenges in dealing with small UAS is the diversity of different types/sizes/operating frequency/etc. We have two types of counter UAS at my installation. These systems provide electronic surveillance/geolocation (is a known drone signal present), and an electronic attack capability to either disable or take control of certain kinds of UAS. These are library based systems, so they're great for handling commercial DJI UAS, and we can even look up the owner's registration, etc, but they wouldn't be very effective against a military type UAS.
Most of what we see are randos flying their DJIs in the nearby state park, and as a DJI owner myself, you have to jump through a lot of hoops to even fly near the Class D airspace here. The device just won't let you do it. Conventional wisdom is that an adversary doing surveillance would use a DJI (easy, plausible deniability, etc), but I'm sure there are some bespoke devices out there being used that won't even show up on most counter-UAS systems. Sounds like the guy at Langley is seeing a combination of those.
I have the authority to engage/bring down any UAS that crosses the installation perimeter, though the law is technically still a bit ambiguous and the FAA still views such actions as "interfering with the operation of an aircraft," which is a felony. DoD and FAA are working on some new language to address this. Bottom line, we don't have a lot of effective solutions for small UAS right now.
Oh my lord, our flight attendants tonight were absolutely enthralled with this topic. One asked me, while we were waiting at the gate “so have you seen them?”. I think I really disappointed those 4 gals when I said “no not ever, just those lights up to the northeast that are always there”. They apparently haven’t been read in on the last 2 years of airline pilot gossip. I could not confirm that there are UFOs active over Oregon, unfortunately. They were even asking about it again on the pee breaks
So all of this is the plot of a Tom Clancy book?Now that Joe Rogan has weighed in and shared a bat-hit crazy video, this hysteria won't end soon
x.com
x.com
(To paraphrase the linked video if you don't want to watch: This rando has a buddy that says his buddy says he has talked to high level officials 😁, and that there is a loose nuke in NJ, and the drones are out there sniffing for it)
Now that Joe Rogan has weighed in and shared a bat-hit crazy video, this hysteria won't end soon
x.com
x.com
(To paraphrase the linked video if you don't want to watch: This rando has a buddy that says his buddy says he has talked to high level officials 😁, and that there is a loose nuke in NJ, and the drones are out there sniffing for it)