Al Haynes is a name that everyone in aviation should know. That was a pinnacle event in the flourishing idea of CRM. Why do I feel like I'm preaching to the choir?
Al Haynes -- good stick, a gentleman, a good guy ... a short bio from Wiki
![Al%20Haynes-2.jpg](/community/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aviationspeakers.com%2FSpeaker-Pics%2FAl%2520Haynes-2.jpg&hash=7057aea39b00c42401c13d76ddbd81bf)
Al Haynes is a name that everyone in aviation should know. That was a pinnacle event in the flourishing idea of CRM. Why do I feel like I'm preaching to the choir?
We tip toed around the relative airmanship feat that was Cactus 1549 in another thread. "Could you have done it". "Could another crew have done as well", yada, yada. I can say that twice now in 18 years I have flown the sim with no engine power, and I really don't think there is much to landing on a smooth wide long river. Most my props go to the quick analysis, and decision. But something no one had any experience with was the UAL 232 flight control degradation. No real decisions to make. It was instinctive. It was survival. When I was a DC-10 FE we worked something like the UAL 232 profile in the sim. Now that is a bitch! There is airmanship for you. Could I have dead sticked into the Hudson, you bet. Could I have done a better job with UAL 232, I simply can't say for sure.
I know it is yet another thread about the US1549 crash, but I believe this one is of great value and substance about the evolution of airline pilots. New York Magazine published a great article.
[Quotes deleted]
How many freakin times did he have to tell that controller that he was going in the Hudson??