DCODefaultUsername
FY2025 DCO Applicant
I sincerely appreciate this detailed overview of the scoring process, it's now much more clear to me what other applicants on this forum are talking about for the commonly discussed panel/OIC scores.On the NAVCRUIT 1131/5 Interviewer’s Appraisal Sheet, there isn’t a single “combined” score that’s calculated the way you’d see on a school exam instead, the interviewer rates you separately in several categories, and each category can be marked at different levels.
Here’s how it works:
1. Rating Categories
You’re evaluated on multiple performance and potential areas. For an DCO interview, these typically include:
- Oral Communication and Expression of Ideas
- Appearance and Poise
- Leadership Potential
- Potential as a Career Naval Officer
- Fit with Community Qualifications
- Program Motivation
2. Rating Scale
Each category has descriptors and a 5-point qualitative scale:
- Unsatisfactory
- Adequate
- Good
- Excellent
- Outstanding (asterisked if extreme, meaning the interviewer must justify it in comments)
3. “Willingness to Have Under Command” Number
This is the 0–10 score you saw it’s a single separate metric, not an average.
- 0 = “Prefer not to have”
- 5 = “Be pleased to have”
- 10 = “Particularly like to have”
Getting a 10 means the interviewer is signaling maximum endorsement for you personally serving under their command.
4. Written Comments Matter
COMNAVCRUITCOM instructions make clear that the narrative comments carry just as much (or more) weight than the checkboxes. If you get multiple “Outstanding” ratings plus a strong written recommendation that’s as close as you get to a perfect “score.”
5. Panel Scoring
In a panel interview, you’ll get one of these forms from each panel member. The selection board will review all of them, looking for consistency in ratings, endorsement level (0–10), and narrative strength.
Bottom line:
You didn’t get a “total score” like 48/50 instead, you received the highest possible marks in the categories that matter most, plus a 10/10 on the command endorsement scale. In board terms, that’s essentially a “perfect interview sheet.”
The scoring system is fairly opaque from the applicant point of view-- that or I've not searched hard enough to find information on how it works..
Either way, thank you greatly for the explanation!
So based on what you've said, a 4.0/5 is the maximum possible score for any specific category without an additional written justification? My recruiter also mentioned that the average for this cycle so far was 4.1, so might mean there are almost exclusively fantastic applicants!