You're nibbling around the real issue here, Brett, which
@Python1287 and
@wink are alluding to or saying quietly--they feel that that the literally majority of institutions of higher learning are radical leftist laboratories which push out more propaganda than scholarship. In their paranoid view this condition is entrenched by design and intractable on its face.
Objective scientific research, peer-reviewed social science scholarship done in good faith, and uncomfortable but objective and well-supported historical research conflict with the right wing narrative and propaganda that the conservative establishment shoves down the reactionary electorate throats every day.
So it must be false. It must be liberal indoctrination.
Why do you think places like
Bob Jones or
Liberty, or PragerU have sprung up? Why do you think something as fundamentally stupid as Conservapedia exists? It's the false assertion that their must be two equal sides to every argument. A purposeful false dichotomy for every academic subject.
Scientific consensus on global warming? Must be a left wing conspiracy.
Overwhelming evidence for evolution and a billions of years old fossil record? Scientists falsify carbon dating and hide fossils.
New historical narratives which paints our nation's history in the genocidal light it rightly deserves? Must be anti-american leftist bias.
Reality, in their mind, has a left-wing bias.