3rd Fleet's first floor looks like something out of a sci-fi movie with the wood paneling, gray-white lights, and the curve in the hallway.
not familiar with that.....is that the Antartica fleet?
3rd Fleet's first floor looks like something out of a sci-fi movie with the wood paneling, gray-white lights, and the curve in the hallway.
Funny, because CENTCOM currently is one of the fanciest (wood paneled in all the right ways) palaces I have ever set foot in. Them and DIA together, across the walking path, share that crown I suppose.
[notsureifserious.jpg]not familiar with that.....is that the Antartica fleet?
Anyone read the US Navy's Strategic Readiness Review? I haven't read the whole thing but I did skim the recap at CDR Salamander. Doesn't sounds like there's much that would surprise anyone who's been near a seawall or operational unit in the past decade.
http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-navys-strategic-readiness-review.html
Yeah, I’m curious to see if a critical read of the actual document would match with Sal’s self congratulatory read of it. But the fact that someone who’s always been so critical of anything on Navy letterhead was fawning over it led me to think it must be worth a read.Don’t think I’ve ever seen Sal pop a chub over a DoN document like that.
Nailed it. Sal has allowed himself to turn into an easily dismissed meme of an old man shouting at clouds.Sal’s self congratulatory read of it.
Sometimes, I have trouble getting past all of his typos. He really needs an editor.Nailed it. Sal has allowed himself to turn into an easily dismissed meme of an old man shouting at clouds.
For some reason the document that Sal linked to via scribd showed up in ComicSans font and I couldn't read it like that. The version USNI posted was in a professional font that I was able to read. I've skimmed it and I thought it was a decent "here's how we got to Abilene" story written in an approachable way for those outside of USN such as congressional staffers. I thought it was interesting how the aviation and sub communities were recognized for their best practices and it was recommended that the surface community adopt many of them. Beyond that many of the issues seemed to fall directly in line with the issues that are discussed on here ad-nasuem: normalization of deviance, deferred maintenance, poor training, lack of funding, pitfalls of optimal manning, and so on. Most of the recommendations were a shot across the bow to OSD and Congress and seemed to hinge on funding. All in all a decent summary of how the road to hell was paved with good intentions but without real and continual pushing from the top and funding I have a feeling this report will end up on the pile of other ignored reports that the authors were very aware of.Sometimes, I have trouble getting past all of his typos. He really needs an editor.