Sorry, so many people ask questions like that (in an official capacity) that I missed the joke.
I am sure making you feel like you avatar soemtimes.
Sorry, so many people ask questions like that (in an official capacity) that I missed the joke.
Wait the T-34 had weapons?
A T-34C would be fun to own, but I bet turbine maintenance is incredibly expensive.
they RTB'd after getting jumped by a pair of Sea Harriers who put a cannon shell in the back seat of one (didn't explode).
Lucky SOBs, I miss the sliding canopy on the T-34C , i shouldn't bitch but I got the T-6 to worry about
Nope, no NACWS on any of ours. We've had lots of rumors about picking up more airplanes once Corpus throws in the towel but I'm not holding my breath...I'd be curious to know if there are any satellite T-34s with NACWS, as that's the easiest way to tell if they're "new" to the site.
I flew with the canopy open every chance I had in Primary
Plus, I love having a HUD and an FMS. I like the canopy open flying but I think I'd take a HUD over it
Nope, no NACWS on any of ours. We've had lots of rumors about picking up more airplanes once Corpus throws in the towel but I'm not holding my breath...
As for turbine costs, that'd be a good comparison and I'd be curious about it, too. Jet A is usually cheaper than 100LL but I don't know if that's enough to cover the costs.
Yep, we've got 949. It looks much better without the orange and white paint job.I think you guys have one of ours. Either 947 or 949 (I want to say it's 947). Miramar got the other one. <sigh>
I've been trying to crack that nut for some time, to actually get a real number to compare to. For the reliability, a turbine could be well worth the effort versus a piston engine. However, I quickly lose interest when I compare the ~40 gallons/hour versus, let's say, 10 gallons/hour.