Yup LT Ray Reyes! called me "Maverick" as soon as he saw my scores hahah great guy, enlisted in the same community I was too!
Yeah, I met him out of nowhere and started the process. Made things super easy for me coming from Maine.
Yup LT Ray Reyes! called me "Maverick" as soon as he saw my scores hahah great guy, enlisted in the same community I was too!
yes, my actual recruiter is LT Oberts, she's my point of contact, and the one I sent all my paperwork, LORs and what not, I think LT Reyes is the more senior person there, and most definitely the one who sells being a Mustang more than anyone elseYeah, I met him out of nowhere and started the process. Made things super easy for me coming from Maine.
Here is what I just heard from my OR (Denver NTAG):
He has not received an OFFICIAL Navy announcement, however, it has been strongly conveyed to him that this board will be selecting minimal or NO SNA's. According to him, this is due to the Navy frontloading certain designators (SNA, Chaplain, and Med) for the last few OCS classes. Hence, the trend of high selection rate for the last few boards. Now they have a bottleneck in the training pipeline with a lot of SNA's being paid to wait in limbo. In other words, "they filled the funnel basin and have to wait for it to drain before adding more".
They are not "full of SNA applicants" for this board or no-longer in need of pilots but the training pipeline is backed up, likely slowed down by COVID-19.
The board is still looking to give out Pro rec Y to NFO's. He is looking into what happens if you apply SNA & NFO for this board and are picked up for NFO. Whether you will still be considered for SNA at the following (May) board or if you have been considered for both already.
This is still unofficial but as of now, my recruiter in Denver has been tasked to NOT send any SNA only applications to the board. I do not know if they plan on considering the ones that have already been submitted but I believe not. Why cut-off applications instead of just being more selective?
Definitely a disappointment but I guess it happens when you apply at the end of the fiscal year. Time to update our plans of action.
The board dates for FY21-22 will likely be very similar to FY20-21. I have attached this year's board schedule, for reference.
The next SNA board will probably be around May 25th with a submission deadline around April 9th.
Of course, it is possible my recruiter is incorrect with the lack of communication from NRC. So, I still plan to finish my application for this board and let my recruiter handle what to do. He is experienced and has been knowledgeable of the best ways to work the system.
I think that's true, but they start picking the next fiscal year's quota's beginning in the May board. The May aviation board was selecting for FY20 and FY21 quota's and the August and now October board were purely FY21 selections.I might be missing something, but didn't the Fiscal Year start on October 1st, 2020?
I think that's true, but they start picking the next fiscal year's quota's beginning in the May board. The May aviation board was selecting for FY20 and FY21 quota's and the August and now October board were purely FY21 selections.
Makes a lot of senseGiven the new process it is probable that you will see the board before May selecting for the next FY, mainly because if a board is held mid-May results come out mid-June, that only give about 2 weeks to get people to OCS to be an accession for the current FY.
There are several errors with what your recruiter has said, for instance Chaplain and med do not go to OCS, they go to ODS and that is a different area so the people waiting to go to OCS are not affected by ODS people. The pipeline being backed up is one issue, new accessions is another as the USN commissions officers by YG and they are competing for promotion by YG (year groups). They could cut accession numbers if they don't feel they can get enough through OCS the way they are doing it.
This type of issue has happened in the past where NRD's held applications because they thought no one would be selected, and guess what, the board was held as normal, rumors cause issues, if there was truly and issue NRC would put out official correspondence. If a board was going to select no SNA's then they would just roll them over to the next board.
Good to know. He may have been making a comparison to how those designators were prioritized through training. Of course, this is ALL still only a rumor at this point and everyone should still submit their applications.
In your experience, would the NRC send out official correspondence if the numbers of SNA's selected were going to be extremely low (around 10) but not zero?
If my OR wants to hold back my application, should I request (as strongly as I can) him to still send it in no matter what?
Why would several different NRD's be saying the same thing, without any official NRC statement? My OR merely stated that he heard this "down the grapevine". I assume there is some non-official communication with NRC.
if you don't mind me asking, what happened the first time?Hey all, I just wanted to offer a piece of advice to everyone who is stressed about the SNA selections this time around. Don’t read too much into rumors or hearsay, this is my second time around applying (I put in for the August board) and there where tons of rumors going around there that ended up being false. Worry about what is under your control and let whatever else happens happen, this process is stressful enough without stressing about something that you literally can’t do anything about. Get your packages in, study for your ASTB’s and let whatever else fall into place. Best of luck to everyone
Here is what I just heard from my OR (Denver NTAG):
He has not received an OFFICIAL Navy announcement, however, it has been strongly conveyed to him that this board will be selecting minimal or NO SNA's. According to him, this is due to the Navy frontloading certain designators (SNA, Chaplain, and Med) for the last few OCS classes. Hence, the trend of high selection rate for the last few boards. Now they have a bottleneck in the training pipeline with a lot of SNA's being paid to wait in limbo. In other words, "they filled the funnel basin and have to wait for it to drain before adding more".
They are not "full of SNA applicants" for this board or no-longer in need of pilots but the training pipeline is backed up, likely slowed down by COVID-19.
The board is still looking to give out Pro rec Y to NFO's. He is looking into what happens if you apply SNA & NFO for this board and are picked up for NFO. Whether you will still be considered for SNA at the following (May) board or if you have been considered for both already.
This is still unofficial but as of now, my recruiter in Denver has been tasked to NOT send any SNA only applications to the board. I do not know if they plan on considering the ones that have already been submitted but I believe not. Why cut-off applications instead of just being more selective?
Definitely a disappointment but I guess it happens when you apply at the end of the fiscal year. Time to update our plans of action.
The board dates for FY21-22 will likely be very similar to FY20-21. I have attached this year's board schedule, for reference.
The next SNA board will probably be around May 25th with a submission deadline around April 9th.
Of course, it is possible my recruiter is incorrect with the lack of communication from NRC. So, I still plan to finish my application for this board and let my recruiter handle what to do. He is experienced and has been knowledgeable of the best ways to work the system.