• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

31July2023 SNA/SNFO Board

E

exNavyOffRec

Well-Known Member
LightningRaptor13 said:
No point in speculating like this. It’s nice to get self reassurance but really just freaks most others out in the process (especially if you actually have solid scores). We’re all high strung for the next few weeks. Best to keep heads high and cross the bridge of selection once we get there . Personally, I am very optimistic.

Plus, there is a Pro Rec Y SNA on last board’s spreadsheet with 40 4/5/4, meaning that the whole person concept is not discredited.
Click to expand...
Sorry that is not accurate, that person was ISPP, that means as long as they meet the minimums they are in, the only review needed is by NRC to ensure they meet the ISPP and designator PA, then as long as there are quotas available the board sticks a Y on them.
 
UpdateNFAAS

UpdateNFAAS

PRO REC Y SNFO
Contributor
exNavyOffRec said:
Sorry that is not accurate, that person was ISPP, that means as long as they meet the minimums they are in, the only review needed is by NRC to ensure they meet the ISPP and designator PA, then as long as there are quotas available the board sticks a Y on them.
Click to expand...
I wish I had known more about that program before this board.?
 
E

eryman818

Active Member
exNavyOffRec said:
Sorry that is not accurate, that person was ISPP, that means as long as they meet the minimums they are in, the only review needed is by NRC to ensure they meet the ISPP and designator PA, then as long as there are quotas available the board sticks a Y on them.
Click to expand...
We have someone applying this cycle who met ISPP requirements and applied ISPP but was not selected.
 
L

LightningRaptor13

Member
exNavyOffRec said:
Sorry that is not accurate, that person was ISPP, that means as long as they meet the minimums they are in, the only review needed is by NRC to ensure they meet the ISPP and designator PA, then as long as there are quotas available the board sticks a Y on them.
Click to expand...
Y’all definitely know more if the specific example used was incorrect, but I think the greater point of the original post is still valid.
 
E

exNavyOffRec

Well-Known Member
eryman818 said:
Applied the previous board ISPP and wasn’t selected. Reapplying this board which meets Monday. I believe his application this time is still ISPP.
Click to expand...
They way it has been going is if a person applies ISPP and is determined or thought to not be able to go ISPP they will not put the ISPP tag on them, but the info doesn't necessarily get back to the applicant which can cause confusion.
 
BDavis11

BDavis11

Well-Known Member
Contributor
UpdateNFAAS said:
That's the plan, but I'm cutting it close on age. I'm assuming no age waivers in order to get selected for that even though the PA allows, correct?
Click to expand...
Correct, no waivers at all. Someone two boards ago was ISPP and convinced they had an age waiver. I think they got processed regular and just so happened to be selected. So it’s like @exNavyOffRec is saying that the applicant will never know if they got switched because there is no feed back and causes confusion
 
B

Biff42

Well-Known Member
BDavis11 said:
Correct, no waivers at all. Someone two boards ago was ISPP and convinced they had an age waiver. I think they got processed regular and just so happened to be selected. So it’s like @exNavyOffRec is saying that the applicant will never know if they got switched because there is no feed back and causes confusion
Click to expand...
Haha yeah I remember that dude.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top