FormerRecruitingGuru
Making Recruiting Great Again
They're preparing these students for Brett's squadron.
I'm curious how many people that really is. Going back to my previous squadron I can't think of a single officer who I have seen fail a PRT. Even if there is a small percentage that fail, you're not really helping it by sending em back somewhere.I have a feeling this may be a reaction to the overall continuum of fitness throughout the training pipeline..or lack thereof. When 23 year-old CAT 1s are showing up to the RAG out of standards and/or unable to pass the PRT, I'm guessing they're seeing similar issues throughout the pipeline.
But I agree, certainly cheaper to keep them and deal with it locally.
I'm curious how many people that really is. Going back to my previous squadron I can't think of a single officer who I have seen fail a PRT. Even if there is a small percentage that fail, you're not really helping it by sending em back somewhere.
Let me guess . . . the paperwork drill for ADSEP/redes then becomes the commissioning source's problem too. Along with (allegedly) gainful employment while that works its way through the bureaucracy.I imagine the rationale for sending them back from whence they came is to put pressure on the commissioning sources to take responsibility for what they're sending to the TRACOM. "They can spend six months as a sailing instructor at USNA, but make sure they show up fit and shipshape at Pensacola, or they'll be your problem again."
...if you were above the weight limit (we assume he meant the 231 pound aviation limit) you would be "sent back to your commissioning source"....
...I imagine the rationale for sending them back from whence they came is to put pressure on the commissioning sources to take responsibility for what they're sending to the TRACOM....
...get arrested for everything up to and including poaching...it was eye-watering sometimes...
I'm curious how many people that really is. Going back to my previous squadron I can't think of a single officer who I have seen fail a PRT. Even if there is a small percentage that fail, you're not really helping it by sending em back somewhere.
I'm not disagreeing with you that it's probably more trouble than it's worth from a tax-payer's point of view, but I believe the number here is 2 in the last 6 months. Both CAT 1s. I believe that's 200% (or maybe it's just "E" on the calculator) more than historically normal.
This sounds a bit like a scare tactic, they might do it to one or two folks to make an example of them if they are so inclined but I imagine the threat alone will do most of its job. Sort of like the threat your dependents wouldn't get your SGLI if you die doing something illegal, which was nothing but a load of BS but still scares folks.
Pretty sure some them eventually got winged.
Anyone that's down there now have a projection on how long A-pool is right now? I check in the first week of April and was just wondering what it looks like
...Also for anyone reading this, PLEASE do not check-in in your chokers, as ~15 or so people tried to do last week.
Anyone that's down there now have a projection on how long A-pool is right now? I check in the first week of April and was just wondering what it looks like
...PLEASE do not check-in in your chokers, as ~15 or so people tried to do last week.
How did that happen? One of them think it was a good idea and it spread or did someone pull one over on them?
Pink Sheets: Don't get these. Two gets you a PRB, and three means you are kicked out of aviation. Can be awarded in IFS, API, or even from doing stupid things in A pool.