Air force + playboy

[dodge]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16585140/

Sergeant in trouble for Playboy photos

"Drop and give me 20!" is something you might hear Air Force Staff Sgt. Michelle Manhart yell to airmen trainees at Lackland Air Force Base. Drop her trousers is what Manhart did for Playboy magazine, and now it's landed her in trouble with the military.

"Of what I did, nothing is wrong so I didn't anticipate anything, of course," Manhart said Thursday of the pictorial. "I didn't do anything wrong so I didn't think it would be a major issue."

Manhart, 30, who is married with two children, has been relieved of her duties pending an investigation, according to Lackland AFB spokesman Oscar Balladares.

"This staff sergeant's alleged action does not meet the high standards we expect of our airmen, nor does it comply with the Air Force's core values of integrity, service before self, and excellence in all we do. It is not representative of the many thousands of outstanding airmen who serve in the U.S. Air Force today," Balladares said, reading a statement.

Poor headwork?

 

[Flash]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16585140/

Poor headwork?

Uhhhh, got pictures??

 

[A.Kuettel]

I am not so sure I wanna see nudie pics of that broad.

 

[Lawman]

Uhhhh, got pictures??

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=106923393

That took about 3 seconds on Google. Im not linking the nude ones, this stuff is suido-work safe. Also, for those without one it'll only let you look at her photos direct if you have a login. But you can use the links to her little slide shows.

Judging from the general layout, Im gonna go with attention whore.

 

[Flash]

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=106923393

That took about 3 seconds on Google. Im not linking the nude ones, this stuff is suido-work safe. Also, for those without one it'll only let you look at her photos direct if you have a login. But you can use the links to her little slide shows.

Judging from the general layout, Im gonna go with attention whore.

Hmmmmmm......I wonder if the USAF paid for those, it has happened before.....

 

[Intruder Driver]

Not even good man-mades.

 

[Lawman]

Not even good man-mades.

For less then 15 grand there is no such thing. My ex's cost 9 and they felt like overinflated waterballons.

 

[SteveG75]

Airbrushing can do wonders.

Anyone remember the NFO who posed for Playboy about 8 years ago? She looked great in the layout but in real life.....

BTW: The Navy was first with Playboy. We had a enlisted sailor first then then the LT NFO.

 

[Lawman]

Airbrushing can do wonders.

Anyone remember the NFO who posed for Playboy about 8 years ago? She looked great in the layout but in real life.....

BTW: The Navy was first with Playboy. We had a enlisted sailor first then then the LT NFO.

Lt Frederica Spilman and Sherry Lynne White. They are mentioned in the last few paragraphs.

 

[Rugger]

Playmid - 1989

Anyone remember the Playmid fiasco from 1989? It was a parody in the Log (another memory from the past) but deemed too controversial by the Superintendant/Commandant/Powers that Be.

 

[Gatordev]

Judging from the general layout, Im gonna go with attention whore.

Sounds about right, to me, especially after seeing that link you had.

...Manhart said Thursday of the pictorial. "I didn't do anything wrong so I didn't think it would be a major issue."

So she's incredibly stupid, too?

 

[Tom]

I googled Spilman and the third link was a thread from AW started from Left Eye. How about that?

 

[snake020]

Let's see

US Playboy with air force broad

or

Brasilian Playboy with Brasilera


tough choice for me

PLEASE do not post pictures of the first I don't want to spit coffee all over the keyboard

 

[bunk22]

To make a judgement call on this one will require some research. I will have to examine in details, her photos, and then come to my conclusion. That's of course whether she deserves the honor of being in Playboy :icon_smil

 

[phrogdriver]

She's a SSgt (in the USAF that's an E-5) that joined in '94? Not exactly a go-getter, at least in the military sense.