The important difference is the 6 Jan folks tried to attack the capitol in order to overthrow the peaceful transfer of power following a free and fair election.The only difference
Last edited:
The important difference is the 6 Jan folks tried to attack the capitol in order to overthrow the peaceful transfer of power following a free and fair election.The only difference
Yeah, yeah, blah, blah…The important difference is the 6 Jan folks tried to attack the capitol in order to overthrow the peaceful transfer of power following a free and fair election.
They directly attacked the certifying of the election, with the stated, recorded goal of "getting" the members of congress. And did so at the incitement of the losing, outgoing POTUS.By definition they are either both insurrections or both riots. To say anything else is hypocrisy and unequally treatment.
5Ys this. See where it takes you.They happened because people felt as if their votes weren't being counted and that the democratic process was failing due to fraud and malfeasance.
They directly attacked the certifying of the election, with the stated, recorded goal of "getting" the members of congress. And did so at the incitement of the losing, outgoing POTUS.
No comparison.
Do you think it is professional to be in a senior leadership position and question the Navy's promotion system in a mentoring setting?I hate to break it to you, BUT unqualified, unworthy people DO get promoted in today's Navy because of their genitals, and perhaps, skin color. I've sat in the room and watched it happen while I objected to said person (who I knew and had flown with numerous times) being chosen for a prestigious billet because "we needed more girls." It didn't take 2 months of her being around for people to start saying "who is this girl and why the fuck is she here?"
Sanitizing the records of gender and whatnot is the only truly fair way to guarantee that things aren't happening like that. It's one of the smartest and most surprisingly fair decisions I've seen the Navy make.
That's no different than the dumbasses who took over the wildlife refuge in Oregon. Shoot them all, says me.And Seattle rioters took over a large area of the city and declared it a free nation. That is text book insurrection.
There was also a federal court house under siege, kept from operating and continually damaged. A police station set on fire and another one occupied for a month or so. Again, alll classic insurrection.
5Ys this. See where it takes you.
Do you think it is professional to be in a senior leadership position and question the Navy's promotion system in a mentoring setting?
Do you think it is ok to sit there and allude to the minority and female Officers in your command that some (most?) are there because the Navy allows unqualified people to get promoted for diversity?
All the XO did was make it appear that if you were different from the majority then you were starting off with a target on your back.
That's no different than the dumbasses who took over the wildlife refuge in Oregon. Shoot them all, says me.
But the 6 January folks attacked the heart of our constitutional process, which is free and fair elections followed by the peaceful transfer of power. Neither the folks in Seattle nor the ones in Oregon did that.
Did they get in? Did security have to rush the Supremes into hiding while calls were made to the Pentagon for backup? I missed that.Should we have opened fire upon the leftist protestors that were trying to break down the doors to stop Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings?
I'm no fan of CNN or modern journalistic practices in general, but I completely disagree with you, which is why I posted the video.
IMO, and with all UCMJ-required respect to Rep. Gaetz, his question appeared to be:
1. Deceptively rhetorical. I don't think he ever intended to let GEN Milley truly answer it.
2. Total BS. He might as well have said, "I've got a black friend, and he says racism isn't really a big deal." Has he really gone out and surveyed military units and found that the more racially diverse units are more upset about the extremism training? No, of course not, it's BS rhetoric, designed to inflame and garner support.
I'm not saying every insurrectionist in the Capitol on 6 Jan was a racist, but disenfranchisement naturally has a tribal component to it, and for many of the angriest in the mob that day, the target of their rage is non-whites and immigrants.
Their concerns should have still been addressed by the people in leadership
You're right. I don't support quotas or any of those types of programs. I know it happens and don't think otherwise.I'm not questioning the process. I'm saying the process was improved. I'm also not "alluding" that "most" are there for that reason. But what I AM saying is that it absolutely happens and that I've sat in the room while someone that was unqualified was chosen based upon their gender rather than ACTC quals, hours, or fitreps. I'm also NOT making any comment about or defense for your XO's comments. But it does happen and to think otherwise, especially in this in this political climate, is incredibly naive.
Understanding the actual rules and situations you're watching unfold makes these hyperbolic CNN headlines even more ridiculous than they already are. Furthermore, they way that Milley proceeds to blame the 6JAN riot on "White Rage" is utterly ridiculous. The events of that day didn't happen because of "White Rage" or anyone's skin color. They happened because people felt as if their votes weren't being counted and that the democratic process was failing due to fraud and malfeasance. Milley shouldn't need books on CRT or "white rage" to understand something so simple.