Until equity is achieved, of course! Who decides that? Who knows! Why do you hate equity?Just a stop date. How should the government determine that justice is restored, and then treat everyone equally again? This is not a trivial question.
Until equity is achieved, of course! Who decides that? Who knows! Why do you hate equity?Just a stop date. How should the government determine that justice is restored, and then treat everyone equally again? This is not a trivial question.
Both scenarios are racist. It’s not complicated.No clear answer, so you just pick one. It can be time-based (until some date) or event-based (number through) or performance-based (game has been raised by X amount) and you just do it. It won't be perfect, just better.
The idea that holding someone down is racist, but so is lifting them up after having held them down...you've just removed the power of the word "racist" to discriminate between two obviously different scenarios.
Did you miss the fact the Bishop Estate existed when Hawaii was an independent country? Then America decided to overthrow it and take all of their public land and institute their laws.@nodropinufaka
Hawaii as a matter of policy or laws does allow discrimination… against non-Hawaiians. What other state allows discrimination in attending schools (Kamehameha) and allows a racial slur (haole) as an everyday term.
Bishop Estate is basically legally allowed to discriminate against whites without regard to anti-discrimination laws and regulations.
My Dad had to leave Hawaii as a junior in high school and attend a mainland boarding school because he got tired of being beat up for being white.And this line of thinking almost always comes from people who never had to take self responsibility or deal with the repercussions of all of the racist and unjust policies of the past.
It's just easier to point fingers and say "work harder".
See how that works?
You're a pilot, can't you just leave?I’ve lived in Hawaii as a haole on and off my whole life. Hawaii accepts racism against haoles.
Did you miss the fact the Bishop Estate existed when Hawaii was an independent country? Then America decided to overthrow it and take all of their public land and institute their laws.
@nodropinufaka
Your Hawaiian needs to get over it. Hawaii is not going to be given its independence and her yelling and screaming is not going to change that. She can calm the fuck down and accept reality or she can be miserable tilting windmills.
Besides, who in this day and age is really Hawaiian. There has been so much inter-racial breeding that there are very few native Hawaiians left. Even Kamehameha schools just looks for one Hawaiian somewhere in your ancestry and a kid of any alumni is automatically considered of Hawaiian blood no matter how many generations or racially diluted their blood.
There is a push to allow 1/32 Hawaiian blood to inheryHawaiian Homes leases because so few descendants are qualifying.
Your Hawaiians have equal opportunity under the law, are not discriminated against and have great free educational opportunities through Kamehameha Schools if they value education enough to work hard at learning. They can get land for $1/year and pass the lease on to their descendants.
Hawaii as a matter of policy or laws does allow discrimination… against non-Hawaiians. What other state allows discrimination in attending schools (Kamehameha) and allows a racial slur (haole) as an everyday term.
Bishop Estate is basically legally allowed to discriminate against whites without regard to anti-discrimination laws and regulations.
You screaming Hawaiian lady does not impress me and is just another whacko with a lost cause.
History is full of lands world wide being conquered and assimilated, including lands full of white people. Hawaii is in no way unique, just more recent. But it’s still history and present day.If your land was stolen by the United States, you were forced to lose your culture, feel ashamed for being Hawaiian, and then struggled you would not be happy either.
Serious question. Does that make it ok?History is full of lands world wide being conquered and assimilated, including lands full of white people. Hawaii is in no way unique, just more recent. But it’s still history and present day.
No it's not. It's part of the practical implementation of a policy you desire. The difference between it and other laws and policies is that it's an initiative that seeks to right a previous injustice. Once that is achieved it should no longer be necessary unlike most other laws which continue on in perpetuity. Thus, the end date / criteria is not silly.Well it kind of is. It's a pretty silly talking point. Our government representatives are elected by the people. Why is this any different when compared to all sorts of other public laws and policies?
Well it kind of is. It's a pretty silly talking point. Our government representatives are elected by the people. Why is this any different when compared to all sorts of other public laws and policies?
Here’s a more relevant question:Serious question. Does that make it ok?
Was the overthrow of Hawaii justified because history is full of nations being overthrown?
Was the Indian Removal Act justified?
Should they just forget about it?Here’s a more relevant question:
What does it matter now? What is the best way forward for a native Hawaiian? Is reminding white people who had nothing to do with what happened 100+ years ago how unjust it was helping?