I'm sure this was taken seriously....
Miss Piggy! One former Foo Dog in my squadron called that bird an IG investigation just waiting to happen.
I'm sure this was taken seriously....
From my limited perspective this all makes sense.CMV-22 barely does that. I know this has resulted in a lot of vigorous arm flailing, but CMV-22 isn't going away. They'll address the deficiencies and move forward. While it's clearly a suboptimal replacement for COD, it's the one the Navy decided it could afford.
CMV-22 barely does that. I know this has resulted in a lot of vigorous arm flailing, but CMV-22 isn't going away. They'll address the deficiencies and move forward. While it's clearly a suboptimal replacement for COD, it's the one the Navy decided it could afford.
Yes, buy what you can afford, not what you need. A-6=>[A-12]=>F/A-18 is a great example as well as the COD=>VOD show.Agreed. I was mainly looking at this as a case study of how the acquisitions process has been broken over the past several decades.
CMV-22 barely does that. I know this has resulted in a lot of vigorous arm flailing, but CMV-22 isn't going away. They'll address the deficiencies and move forward. While it's clearly a suboptimal replacement for COD, it's the one the Navy decided it could afford.
Cost, and time. There was just no other COD replacement option out there that was going to get new airplanes actually delivering ass, trash, and pony in less than ten years. Big Navy kept kicking that can down the road until the choice was either V-22 or punt with yet another C-2 SLEP. And the youngest C-2 is 35 years old.Yes, buy what you can afford, not what you need. A-6=>[A-12]=>F/A-18 is a great example as well as the COD=>VOD show.
If they stuck with the C-2 the you could have people saying I fly the C-2 like my father and grandfather lol.Cost, and time. There was just no other COD replacement option out there that was going to get new airplanes actually delivering ass, trash, and pony in less than ten years. Big Navy kept kicking that can down the road until the choice was either V-22 or punt with yet another C-2 SLEP. And the youngest C-2 is 35 years old.
So much like the F/A-18 decision. How many years has the B-52 flown?Cost, and time. There was just no other COD replacement option out there that was going to get new airplanes actually delivering ass, trash, and pony in less than ten years. Big Navy kept kicking that can down the road until the choice was either V-22 or punt with yet another C-2 SLEP. And the youngest C-2 is 35 years old.
Now that’s left to the B-52 and maybe a few great-grandfathers!If they stuck with the C-2 the you could have people saying I fly the C-2 like my father and grandfather lol.
61 years! (Going to H models) Hard to believe.So much like the F/A-18 decision. How many years has the B-52 flown?
That’s roughly half of history of aviation. Incredible.61 years! (Going to H models) Hard to believe.
Wikipedia says 69 for the fortress.I think it's more like 68 years for the B-52 at this point. The P-3 had a pretty respectable run of about 60 years (plus, still flying with some countries).
Some of these numbers are the equivalent of fighting Vietnam with World War I SPADs!Wikipedia says 69 for the fortress.
Now for some helo love:
Those are all fielding/introduction numbers. The YUH-60A first flight was 5 years before the Army fielded it.
- The H-1 is 65, which I think makes it the longest serving choppah.
- I saw a green & white H-3 flying yesterday for 63 years of service.
- The H-60 is only 45, but my money is on it going to 70+.
I think it's more like 68 years for the B-52 at this point. The P-3 had a pretty respectable run of about 60 years (plus, still flying with some countries).