Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you write enought letters saying that you won't buy the paper, or use whatever product, they more than likely will stop using the offending material!!
graymatter said:Its kinda hard to do that when the paper is free.
livefast said:I think most of you missed the point of the cartoon. It's a swipe on the administration's handling of Iraq. It is not saying our brothers in the service are disposable or that their deaths are a good thing.
Fly Navy said:...to further their agenda...
Let's try David Kay, our chief weapons inspector in Iraq.Whose to say Saddam didn't have WMD's?
But why would he? Wouldn't he use them? Put yourself in Saddam's shoes for a second: You know you're facing the world's best equipped, trained, and funded armed fighting force in the history of the world. You know your chances of capture or death are very high. *And, as Patmack wants you to believe, you've got scores of missiles, mobile weapons labs, and flasks of toxic gases.* If you know you're goin down in flames, (and remembering that sociapathic (sp?) killers like Saddam have little respect for anyone's life) why not use what little you *have*? If he had 'em, he woulda used 'em.How easy do you think it would be for Saddam to bury or move everything out before hand.
Because we live in a Representative Democracy. Because although we elect people to make our governmental decisions for us, they still ultimately answer to us, the people. And finally, because I hold a sincere distrust of anyone who freely admits to not reading a daily newspaper (I'm referring to our President, of course).So why don't you take your 10th grade education, and trust the experience and flags that are running the show.
akamifeldman said:...but it deserves a slap in the face.
I know I've said this before, but I'll say it again:
The main justification for war was WMD.
No WMD, no justification for war.
Let's try David Kay, our chief weapons inspector in Iraq.
Or let's try Colin Powell, our Secretary of State, who admits that our pre-war intelligence was shaky and less than reliable (you don't go to war based on unreliable intel).
akamifeldman said:The President phrased (and still does) Iraq as a theater in the overall "War on Terror." It is not. There was no imminent threat to US civilians from Saddam's non-existent WMDs. But, that was how the WH billed it, as some sort of threat, that they were stopping another 9/11 by taking out Saddam now. Simply untrue. If Bush were serious about attacking the heart of terrorism, we'd be knee deep into Saudi Arabia by now. But instead, we got a President who was fixated upon Iraq days after his inaguration, and used 9/11 as rationale to go there. This was about settling old scores, not the noble act the WH proclaims it to be.
akamifeldman said:If he had 'em, he woulda used 'em.