I would not try to force people to do anything. I would give them the facts and the means to protect themselves in whatever ways they wanted, and let them make choices for themselves. They would live or die by those decision. I bet we'd get much higher uptake and less conspiracy theory BS, but I guarantee we wouldn't have a fraction of the downside to the existing policies.
I really, really,
really hope we never encounter the scenario I outlined, but if we do, I think we will have crossed the boundary from protect my freedoms to strangers are shot just to be sure. The absolute worst would be if it was like the Spanish Flu, which took young people's lives.
It's a hard thing to imagine, a virus that kills 9% of infected but spreads like Omicron, but it is absolutely possible without even coming from a Wuhan bio lab. This is Omicron's case rate on the right surge. Multiply it by a bunch since no one would have immunity. Maybe 200,000 dead per day? If people went about their lives as normal, but there is no way that would happen.
You wouldn't have to tell people to adopt NPIs while waiting for the vaccines. Remember how many people freaked out when we flew some Ebola patients home from Africa?
My goal is to either get rid of the virus forever if that's possible, and if it's not then provide people with tools and knowledge to mitigate it however they see fit for their individual situations and beliefs while getting on with our lives and not destroying our society.
I would love to hear your goal and a detailed and realistic cost-benefit analysis of how you think we can accomplish it.
My approach would have been to follow the
Pandemic Playbook that existed prior Covid-19 hitting. Use the Pandemic 101 approach of NPIs and controls to catch it and drive it down to trackable levels, testing to know where the virus was (you can't control what you don't measure) and contact tracing with local controls to put out fires while waiting for the vaccine. No contradictory messaging from top leadership directly undermining public health efforts. Warp Speed for vaccines was great. Full court pressure on treatments too.
while getting on with our lives and not destroying our society
If you wanted to destroy our society, then you would put out contradictory messaging continuously to split the response on politics, you'd not test so you wouldn't have any intel to know what the enemy virus was up to, and you'd half-ass the controls and support of a vaccine so the virus would mill about in the population as long as possible, breeding as many new variants as possible, steadily grinding down the health system so when a serious new variant hit we'd be out of health care Schlitz.
I wonder if our foreign enemies are taking note.