Actually ... it's kinda interesting how the overall numbers are working out so far. The numbers somewhat parallel the realities of the flight deck of the period (not taking land based into account) :...the phantom is in the lead with 59%??? ....
O.K. ... I see you took matters into your own hands ... post #6 notwithstanding... just "proves" my VP-guy point made therein
.... so cancel SPAD/OV-10 option and choice #11 will be devoted to one Navy squadron that flew for 3 years.
Ain't this a GREAT country??
The A-7 was proof that a rock could fly!
-ea6bflyr![]()
And the F-4 was proof that a brick could ...The A-7 was proof that a rock could fly!
-ea6bflyr![]()
Why did you mix A-6 with EA-6B??? I would clearly want attack, but not EA. I based my choice on mission, loadout, and then crew (in that order).
1. A-6 (max bombs, all attack, not single seat, but you get the best of the NFOs)
2. A-4 (not as many bombs, NO ZUNIS, but single seat and very fun to fly)
3. F-4 (not as much A/G, but still lots of bombs when they did)
4. F-8 (not much A/G, but still single seat and a hell of a classic jet).
Uhhhh ... they both have the same relief tube ???Why did you mix A-6 with EA-6B???...
You know Zab wanted P-2's.....![]()
-ea6bflyr![]()