Again, you are word-smithing. You started by noting that Trump’s win wasn’t substantial (a purely political point of view) and I provided examples of how anyone could argue, without violating fact, that he indeed did. If you want to roll in the narrative - how a bombastic, crude, poorly educated, circus-barker overcame three impeachments, several politically focused law suits, and a solid wall of journalistic antagonism to somehow win, and help win several Senate races, and (barely) hold on to the House, then you have a story that defies traditional political science thus rendering ideas like “red,” “blue,” and even “purple” almost meaningless - for the moment. Trump hit a nerve, he somehow opened generations of people to wanting wild-ass, radical change. I don’t yet know what it is (although I have an idea) and I think many political science types don’t want to know. Use the words you wish…but Trump’s win was extraordinary.
Totally agree, but as others have noted, there isn’t actually a party to stop him - at least not yet.