• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Hard Power and Soft Power

mmx1

Woof!
pilot
Contributor
That whole 'separate but equal' thing was 'settled law' for almost 60 years, until it wasn't.

And no, I'm not mad at all. I just don't think what the President is doing is all that controversial or unconstitutional when held up to the lens of how the federal government evolved in the 20th century.


“No system of ordered liberty can allow the Government to use the carrot of dismissing charges, or the stick of threatening to bring them again, to induce an elected official to support its policy objectives.”
 

Spekkio

He bowls overhand.
Context is key - I was referring to the unilateral slashing of federal agencies that are considered examples of federal overreach. It's been done before, except by someone significantly more charismatic in front of a camera.

As for the meddling in prosecuting Eric Adams... yeah, that's puzzling and bad juju.
 

sevenhelmet

Low calorie attack from the Heartland
pilot

JTS11

Well-Known Member
pilot
Contributor
Appears to be part of a theme. Pardoning the Silk Road guy, J6ers, and cajoling Romania for leniency on the Tate brothers.

It is not a good theme.
WRT Romania, the VP went out of his way at Munich to browbeat Romania's state of their democracy bc their Supreme Court ordered a new presidential election bc the last dude went zero to hero from a Russian-funded social media campaign (TikTok).

I have zero idea why that is in any way a national security interest of ours. Also, same/same for the Tate dudes.
 

number9

Well-Known Member
Contributor
WRT Romania, the VP went out of his way at Munich to browbeat Romania's state of their democracy bc their Supreme Court ordered a new presidential election bc the last dude went zero to hero from a Russian-funded social media campaign (TikTok).

I have zero idea why that is in any way a national security interest of ours. Also, same/same for the Tate dudes.
Then VPOTUS talked about Victor Orban's rule in Hungary, right?

Right?
 

JTS11

Well-Known Member
pilot
Contributor
Rupert Murdoch can join him.
Amazing to watch Carlson state that he was radicalized by his upscale Moscow shopping experience (guaranteed first time grocery shopping)

All that to say, Murdoch can get bent for employing this dude and warping elderly American minds. He's been that way prior to getting booted from Fox.
 

Flash

SEVAL/ECMO
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
Maybe it’s time wise old Europe got a ticking off? I haven’t seen much “western liberal democracy” to defend in Western Europe. I mean there are Pakistani child rape gangs throughout England that go unpunished for ideological reasons. Yet, at the same time, if one were to post any anti-Islam words on UK Facebook the police show up at your house and post your name and address. The same country where English veterans were told to put their Union Jacks away during a parade for fear they might offend immigrants. In Germany cars are driving into crowds (we know all about that - New Orleans) and France is boiling with internal tension. All of this is related and is worthy of open and honest discussion. Besides, all of Europe can, in fact, afford to help Ukraine and discuss their own issues, but they must be discussed.

This is an absurdly bad take, with Western Europe being far freer than any other region in the world. It has its issues but they pale in comparison to almost everywhere else. For us to severely chastise them for 'lacking in freedom of speech' is like us railing against a HOA that won't let folks paint their houses purple while we say nothing of the neighborhood next door where folks are burning each other's houses down and after trying to murder them.

A couple things to note, I don't agree with some of the restrictions many European countries have on freedom of speech but they are very minor, with those countries maintaining very strong freedoms to include speech and press (AP anyone?), the 'grooming gangs' were punished, unlike many in the Catholic Church, it was the English flag folks were advised but not banned from waving around in certain circumstances, probably good advice much like it is probably wise not to wave a Confederate flag marching across Howard U's quad, and we ourselves have boiled with tension on and off for decades.

...we can’t keep asking Ukraine, with a fraction of Russia’s population to continue a meat-grinder war just to show Russia “we mean it!”...

As has already been pointed out, we aren't asking them it is the Ukrainians who are choosing to fight. Most importantly, they should have the choice of how to end it too.

When your party espouses views that are literally aligned with the Nazis, then it’s far beyond a discussion of issues with immigration or liberal versus conservative.
The Nazi angle is worn to near meaninglessness - In fact I’m more concerned that grad students from Harvard, Yale, and Columbia will move to round up Jews long before the AfD gains any power. I am no fan of AfD and I doubt they’ll ever gain a strong majority in Germany, but I oppose them more for their desire to be closer to Russia than any Nazi adjacent rhetoric.

When major party leaders literally spout off Nazi slogans, use their symbology and promote many of the same ideals the 'Nazi angle' is not 'near meaningless'. If they walk like Nazis, talk like Nazi ideas and look like Nazis...I'm pretty damn sure they are Nazi scum.
 

Flash

SEVAL/ECMO
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
I was listening to Pod Save America and the team there (mostly former Obama guys) were lamenting that they failed to make this kind of change…I’ve cut and pasted a bit of the synopsis here:

Federal employee retirements are process3d using paper, by hand, in an old limestone mine in Pennsylvania. Seven hundred-plus workers operate 230 feet underground to process about 10,000 applications a month, which are stored in Manila envelopes and cardboard boxes. The retirement process takes multiple months.

Musk’s team sees this Alice in Wonderland filing scheme and decides it needs to end right now. It can all be done on a single spreadsheet and people can just click. We don’t need to send people spelunking in order to get someone’s 401(k) withdrawn. Except modern Democrats see this and think: charming tradition and special workers who must be defended. Every magazine would profile the limestone workers, featuring portraits of them with their grandchildren. There would be elegies to what’s lost when we digitize files in general, and how digitizing files led to this man’s depression and that woman’s divorce. It would be a constitutional crisis not to have a pulley system for the retirement papers. There would be rallies: These are 700 real people! What kind of heartless monster wants 700 lovely people out of a job? Not me! And so the limestone mine retirement processing center for federal workers would continue.”
“Some of this is pretty annoying because it’s some of the stuff we should have done.”

This is another bad take on many levels. Just because folks all the sudden found out about the federal civil service's antiquated and Kafkaesque retirement process doesn't mean it wasn't known about, publicized and profiled before.

Even worse though are some of the claims and supposed solutions to them that folks have trumpeted. The claims often range from the partially inaccurate to outright lies, not only this particular case but many other supposed discoveries like 150 year olds getting Social Security when in reality it is a likely a COBOL default database setting. The 'solutions' espoused may seem easy to outsiders or folks unused to government and its unique responsibilities but once you start digging they become much more complicated and challenging to solve.

Can things be improved in many areas? Of course, but taking a wrecking ball to it and seeing what breaks and what works after is not the way to do it especially when it can cause real harm to folks.
 
Last edited:

taxi1

Well-Known Member
pilot
When major party leaders literally spout off Nazi slogans, use their symbology and promote many of the same ideals the 'Nazi angle' is not 'near meaningless'. If they walk like Nazis, talk like Nazi ideas and look like Nazis...I'm pretty damn sure they are Nazi scum.

AMEN

Elon_Musk_gesture.gif
 

JTS11

Well-Known Member
pilot
Contributor
This is another bad take on many levels. Just because folks all the sudden found out about the federal civil service's antiquated and Kafkaesque retirement process doesn't mean it wasn't known bout, publicized and profiled before.

Even worse though are some of the claims and supposed solutions to them that folks have trumpeted. The claims often range from the partially inaccurate to outright lies, not only this particular case but many other supposed discoveries like 150 year olds getting Social Security when in reality it is a likely a COBOL default database setting. The 'solutions' espoused may seem easy to outsiders or folks unused to government and its unique responsibilities but once you start digging they become much more complicated and challenging to solve.
Can things be improved in many areas? Of course, but taking a wrecking ball to it and seeing what breaks and what works after is not the way to do it especially when it can cause real harm to folks.
I do love that people are papering over the concept that an unelected multi-billionaire with major govt contracts and conflicts are just kind of OK with it all...It's wild.

The 150 yr olds getting benefits from COBOL is <chef's kiss>
 
Top