Nice.Don't think this has been posted in this thread yet but have to love the video here:
http://www.neptunuslex.com/
Nice.Don't think this has been posted in this thread yet but have to love the video here:
http://www.neptunuslex.com/
Wall Street?The movie is better.
For what it's worth, I've read The Art of War probably a half dozen times. I think that it is rather low level thinking, suitable for company grade officers/NCOs. I've also read On War by Clausewitz. I think that's a more suitable book for the level they're supposedly teaching at war colleges.
I agree that it's tough to get through, no more so than your typical Keegan book (and Keegan is writing in English!). You want a huge insight to an insurgency that is redonkulously difficult to get through? That would be How We Won The War by Vo Nguyen Giap.Old Dead Carl provides in-depth explanations to his thoughts, so reading ON WAR will give the reader more information but is tough to get through. (18th century Prussian being translated into 21st centure English)
I don't think they will really learn that much, again - I think it should be read at the level the USMC suggests it. I would hope that a senior officer will have read and/or learned from Sun Tzu prior to being senior officers.But I believe that senior officers (both cil and mil) can learn from Sun Tsu. Understanding the role of the military in support of the state is captured in both books.
Agree wholeheartedly with this.I think both books are great for showing how the charecter of war may have changed over the centuries, but the nature of war has not changed.
Of course you didn't, because we have people like this setting the narrative in our media.