In my case, the same principle applies, but I had a very enjoyable DH tour. YMMV.Could you quantify a similar trade-off for DH tour?
In my case, the same principle applies, but I had a very enjoyable DH tour. YMMV.Could you quantify a similar trade-off for DH tour?
If someone told me that I could have traded being a Divo during my first tour for an extra 200 flight hours, I would have turned them down in a heartbeat. That experience was invaluable to my professional development.
And I disagree 100%. To each their own I guess. I completely agree with @A Day In The Life . I signed on the dotted line to fly.
If someone told me that I could have traded being a Divo during my first tour for an extra 200 flight hours, I would have turned them down in a heartbeat. That experience was invaluable to my professional development.
He is a company man passenger.. Nobody should be shocked!Also, refer to my comment "I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who is a pilot..."
From my experience, WSOs focused far more on ground duties than any of the pilots cared to. So that doesn't surprise me. Different priorities perhaps.
From my experience, WSOs focused far more on ground duties than any of the pilots cared to. So that doesn't surprise me. Different priorities perhaps.
That’s not my experience. Both crew members need flight time to hone their skills. Sounds like there’s some room for community variance. Like I said above, YMMV.Also, refer to my comment "I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who is a pilot..."
From my experience, WSOs focused far more on ground duties than any of the pilots cared to. So that doesn't surprise me. Different priorities perhaps.
Why limit yourself, in the USN you can fly both! @RedFive where's Waldo's picture of LCS, H-60, and MQ-8?If I went Air Force, the only caveat I am afraid is being selected for RPA and not Pilot. I know it sounds kinda whiney but I think the Navy offers better 'manned' aircraft. I know, Officer first, pilot second, but I rather fly a helicopter than a Predator. ?
LCS and MQ-8 being implemented together . . . . how fitting.
Last I heard (briefly at the fleet-fly-in) was that the Stingray would be used for aerial refueling and wouldn't be a replacement for the E-2is that still the plan for MQ-25?
You got to the fleet when? 200 hours was two years of flying for dudes who showed up to Marine Hornet fleet sqdns in 2012/2013. Its worse now.
never meant to imply that mq-25 would be an E-2 replacement. Last I had heard was that Mq-25 was going to be owned and operated by the VAW community in some manner similar to either how hsc or VP have incorporated their unmanned components into their respective communities.Last I heard (briefly at the fleet-fly-in) was that the Stingray would be used for aerial refueling and wouldn't be a replacement for the E-2
Old guy here. A little background. End of the Nam era - tried to get into the Air Force - turned down 2 years in a row (big time RIF happening, had to be academy or A student out of ROTC to get accepted). Somehow, the Navy took a chance on me. Got A-7's after my winging and was devastated (it was enduring some engine problems at the time and didn't have a great reputation behind the boat). Long story short - absolutely fell in love with the plane and the mission for reasons stated in successive posts. Later flew A-4's for over 13 years, mostly in the adversary role as a full-time reservist (TAR). Whichever service you end up in can either be a great experience or a terrible one. It's about 42% up to the individual to as to which way it will go.?I even knew guys who flew A-7s and liked them! Friggin' A-7s! Better to have a sister in a whorehouse than a brother in A-7s!
How many years of your life did you lose to make this pic happen?