Why not just let them build up a tolerance so that when they do drink while in the fleet, they don't act so stupid because of the alcohol.
That is what the ROTC guys are for.
Why not just let them build up a tolerance so that when they do drink while in the fleet, they don't act so stupid because of the alcohol.
Well it came too late to help M/N Ruggerio, Dixon and Carr. They never made it to graduation.
Two got drunk and fell out of Bancroft Hall from a 4th floor window. One drank and chose to ride in a car driven by his drunk friend who crashed it, killing him.
If it keeps one mid from killing himself it's all worth it in my book. If they act like children and continue to get drunk and fight at the Acme Bar and Grill (they do I stand NADO and see the SITREPS), then treat them like children until they improve their behavior and prove themselves worth of some trust.
I don't buy the "socially inept officer" excuse after graduation to justify current binge drinking at USNA.
If it keeps one mid from killing himself it's all worth it in my book.
I agree completely. My argument about the socially inept officer is pretty much for your ordinary, average, every day guy who wakes up with a hangover on Saturday morning and didn't do anything but drink too much. That's the part that I think is crippling them, because they won't know their limits when they're in the fleet, supposedly setting the example for the junior guys. What about a dude that's flown out to his ship immediately after graduation to linkup with them in the med? Newfound freedom + culture of alcohol + foreign port = Poor example set by the new Ens, noticed by the senior O's.Well it came too late to help M/N Ruggerio, Dixon and Carr. They never made it to graduation.
Two got drunk and fell out of Bancroft Hall from a 4th floor window. One drank and chose to ride in a car driven by his drunk friend who crashed it, killing him.
If it keeps one mid from killing himself it's all worth it in my book. If they act like children and continue to get drunk and fight at the Acme Bar and Grill (they do I stand NADO and see the SITREPS), then treat them like children until they improve their behavior and prove themselves worth of some trust.
I don't buy the "socially inept officer" excuse after graduation to justify current binge drinking at USNA.
The BIGGEST problem I've noticed from the mids we sponsor and their friends is that they don't seem to have as much classmate loyalty as in past classes.
I don't buy the "socially inept officer" excuse after graduation to justify current binge drinking at USNA.
... + culture of alcohol + ...
I think the fact that the mids we sponsor were so non-chalant about the deaths: "I don't understand, we ONLY had three!" I'm with you - one is too many.
Hell, I saw it right after I graduated in 2003. USNA grads would go down to Pensacola and lose their damn minds at the bars, parties and restaurants. I'm sure it's only getting worse.
He realized that we needed to look at the actual pieces that lead up to the stupid decisions when we drink.
I've never liked these arguments, because if I argue against it am I saying it's ok that "one mid" dies? Not at all.
It's the same as saying "if gun control saves one life" then it's worth it. Sure, maybe some rule/law/regulation can save one person's life, but at what cost and number of other lives?
It's almost impossible to prove that this will save one life, as well as it's almost impossible to say that not using it will not save one life. The "one life" argument is a slippery slope that can lead to knee-jerk reactions wrt to regulations and laws.
I knew JP and even though his death was tragic, no one can say with 100% certainty that it was because he had a bac of .10 (I can't remember the exact number, it's been a few years now). For that matter, no one is able to say that his death was attributed to alcohol at all. All we know is he had been drinking and woke up dead the next morning.
The issue I have with it is the decision for personal responsibility. I didn't believe when I was a mid that the Academy should tell me how I should be responsible for myself and I don't believe that now. I don't condone binge drinking, but if a mid, or any person for that matter, wants to, it's their personal choice. It is also their personal choice to suffer the consequences of said drinking.
For those mids who get in fights at Acme or wherever, all I can say is no matter how great some may consider the Academy, if a person comes in a turd as a Plebe and then graduates, they'll still be a turd, just polished up a bit.
10% of the people take up 90% of the time. As Tri-Kedge said, hammer the ones who break the law or fvck it away and ball it up.
In my opinion, it's not the drinking that's the problem at the Academy, it's the fact that, or at least during my tenure there, the officials were too easy on the punishments for people who did screw it up. Offenses that would've gotten people booted out before were just getting restriction and tours. Here's a perfect example, a mid makes a fake id using his military id, goes out, gets wasted, comes back to the gate and tries to get back in using the fake. The gate guards know the id is bogus so he gets fried. So, underage drinking, fake id, and general conduct unbecoming, not to mention this is after we had to sign the papers saying no fake ids or automatic dismissal. If it would have been me, boot his ass out. Did they? No, he got to stay. Why would mids take it serious if they knew that yeah, they may stand restriction but will still graduate. It's not a bunch of new rules that the Academy needs (that sounds strangely similar to what happens with gun control, no?) it's the balls to boot people out when they deserve it. That way, the mids that want to be there will do what's right to stay.
/off rant