Steve Davies
Aviation Writer & Photographer
You seem to have you mind pretty much made up on the subject, and your habit of making shit up or posting speculation without factual basis and calling it "my theory" has gotten pretty annoying.
You are aware that I am in the Navy, and this is an Air Force case, right?
Bevo
I have spoken to so many people intimately familiar with this - from intel to pilots responsible for the SAR CAP - that I think there is a good chance that Ribas made it out of the ejection alive and then spent time in the sea. I haven't made up my mind because there is not much to go by, and that's why I was initially interested in what you had to say as someone who appeared to be able to offer an insider's perspective.
For the record, I didn't ask you to volunteer information on the subject - you did so of your own volition. So, forgive me if I think it odd that you put yourself out there and started answering questions about this specific case, but now you're distancing yourself from it with the 'it's not my investigation, and not even the same service' card.
Perhaps you can provide some direct quotes of 'shit I have made up'? I can't see anything that I have written that I have plucked out of thin air and presented as fact.
It depends on a lot of variables, really. A body will only float initially if it has gear attached to it that is buoyant. Then, water temperature and depth play a big part. If the temp is to low, the bacteria in and on the body will die and the body will stay on the bottom. If it is warm enough, the bacteria grow and create gases in the body causing it to float.
One minute you say bodies don't float, but now you say that they can if the conditions are right?
As I said, Ribas floated pretty well.
I really don't have comment on your speculation rather than to point out that it makes my earlier point about people being so passionate about this issue that the emotion often trumps reason. The only evidence that you have talked about is the fact that there is one body with minor injuries (other than being dead). With that, you have formulated in your mind the exact chain of events that happened after they got to the water. Then, your own "theory" (it's fun calling them that) is that the pilot tried to free his WSO from the capsule, failed, and drown in the process. Then the dead WSO somehow managed to do what the pilot couldn't, and freed himself from the sinking capsule so that he could float to the surface.
I don't have a problem with calling a spade a spade - it is just a theory. I also don't know why you find it so offensive to call it one. I had thought that in your line of work, theories about what/who/how/where were a staple part of helping you to decide how to go about finding and recovering people. My bad if that is not the case.
What we do know for a fact is that Ribas got out of the capsule alive. So, no, the WSO didn't do something that the pilot couldn't. I think you need to re-read what I wrote, as you have things backwards.
FWIW, this theory is the one espoused by the F-111 crews that I have spoken to who were on the raid - it is therefore not mine, is derived from people with a practical working knowledge of the F-111 that far exceeds any theoretical knowledge I might have, and is therefore one I subscribe to it as being credible and the best we have.
In any case, I don't need to apologise to you for having spent time wondering what happened to Ribas, or for speaking to his F-111 buddies who have also tried to piece together what happened. Nor do I have to apologise to you for still wanting answers, for trying to get them on the behalf of others, or for holding America to account to do all that it can to get back its fallen warrriors.
So, what happened to the Vatican when they found out the "Devout Catholic" was still not found? If all it took was a little divine intervention from the pope to get one of the guys, why didn't he snap his fingers again and have them give us the other body back? That would be the one that the Vatican had an interest in.
The devout Catholic *was* found. Was I not clear?
There was no divine intervention, but your sarcasm and tone is duly noted.
I don't think that you know what "you guys" you are talking about here. None of the recovery efforts that you seem to have such an issue with would even fall under the folks that work POW/MIA issues. It would all be current operations folks. It would have taken years for the F-111 case to move from one department to the other
I concede that is true. As I said, these comments are not aimed at you personally, and I apologise if it comes off that way.