Again, I’m still not understanding why being exposed to CRT poses any risk to anyone. From my own perspective, knowing that some people I interact with may subscribe to the ideas in CRT helps me communicate with them more effectively, and ultimately be a better leader, which is presumably why the CNO put it on the list in the first place. Some of you are acting like this book will now be the basis for OPNAV policy, again, silly.
I reject the radicalization argument as well. The internet is full of CRT content. If someone wants to dive down that rabbit hole, they hardly need the CNOs list as a springboard.
The radicalization and culture shifting that CRT would cause is of course not tied solely to the CNO's list. The concern is that it has now worked its way into higher education, K-12 education, corporate America, and the mainstream media. One would have thought that the military would've remained agnostic on this topic, but seeing the CNO have it on his list dispels that notion, which is concerning. Again, K-12 education, and troops that are fresh out of high school, have the potential to be more impressionable than older and more mature people. I know I was.
It's not so much about subverting the military by some people being radicalized (though the article in the OP's first post alleges that), it's about the American society at large. And now, we are seeing the military is one more institution to get involved. No, I don't mean involvement like basis for OPNAV policy. That is stupid. But it does give cause for concern.