I'm usually torn over the whole debate over how it was "back then" and how it is now. I generally counsel that shit was just as bad, if not worse at different periods in the past. The garrison militaries between WWI and WWII, the post WWII and post Korea RIFs, the 1970s malaise, etc., are good examples of how the military could objectively be a much worse place than it is today.
The thing that has me concerned, though, is that I think the people serving during those periods recognized that their suffering had a purpose. They were in that figurative case that said "IN CASE OF WAR, BREAK GLASS!" The chickenshit rules, slow promotions, and downsizing would come to an end when it counted, and they knew that then they would be able to serve the way they had always hoped to.
Today, we ARE in a war. A neverending one, in fact, and the bullshit has not only failed to go away, it has gotten deeper. The one thing that is supposed to rudder-steer a military, a major conflict, has not done that. Today, we are a garrison military that fights wars on its off-time. We have cultivated the worst of both worlds. We have the worst of both worlds--martinet garrison BS, plus the pressures and danger of combat deployments and operations.
The premise before was: "Deal with the BS; the important thing is fighting a war." Now, it increasingly seems to be,"Deal with the war; the important thing is the BS."