Not trying to fan the flames (although this will undoutably do so), but has anyone heard anything to the effect of a lessening demand for NFOs in the future? I have a great friend who was a F-14D and F/A-18F NFO who said that the community is shifting in a big way soon with the upcoming retirement of the T-39 and the gradual elimination of the EA-6B from Navy service (USMC will continue to fly it I believe).
I was under the impression that the Navy was managing the draw down by simply letting current Prowler folks transition to other platforms and then lengthening the current NFO pipeline, so his comments surprised me. Does anyone have any hard numbers on historic NFO hiring trends or more current gouge on the topic?
Anyway, sorry if this is the wrong place for the discussion..
I'd be legitimately interested to see how the Marines plan on executing the EA mission single seat though. It'd be pretty busy for one guy.
Back in 2010, VT-86 was producing more than 200 NFOs a year. The current demand signal is about 125 or so.
....We're in the process of standing up two additional squadrons......
No AF but it included Marines.But did those numbers include the Air Force and Marines? Just curious...
Any idea what they are going to call/designate the squadrons?
The last I heard was 143 and 144, but I haven't heard anything on mascots/nicknames yet.
I thought 137 went away at one point in the 90s (as evidenced by the tombstone they dug up from the O Club and kept in their RR). Anyhow, from the documents I've read, I don't think anything is quite set in stone yet.I am disappointed to hear they aren't going to go with 128, my old squadron. Pretty cool patch and a nice 'lineage' though unofficial since a squadron can't be 'reactivated' in the Navy officially. The VAQ-33 'Firebirds' would be pretty cool too. I just hope they aren't going with the 143 patch and logo they tried when that unit almost came into being 10 years ago, the 'Cobras' with their orange and blue patch was pretty 'bleah' to me.
I am still baffled why the Navy is the only service that doesn't let units get deactivated then reactivated, even the USAF has a better job keeping its unit history alive with their squadrons.
Either they make exceptions; or it's a relatively new rule. I recall VA-55 f'lying A-4F Skyhawks at the time, was disestablished in 1975. At the time, ended a lineage dating back to Torpedo Squadron VT-5 in WWII.I am still baffled why the Navy is the only service that doesn't let units get deactivated then reactivated, even the USAF has a better job keeping its unit history alive with their squadrons.
Either they make exceptions
Did the Navy not just reactivate VFA-101? I thought the Grim Reapers died out with the F-14, but now they're back with the F-35.
I worked with that squadron back in 2002 when they were transition to civilian workers (the maintainers), that was an awesome squadron.Did the Navy not just reactivate VFA-101? I thought the Grim Reapers died out with the F-14, but now they're back with the F-35.