Brett327 said:
Not to belabor the point, but here's my analysis. From the replay angle taken at the goal line, it really isn't clear whether the ball crosses the plane or not. You can probably assume that it does, but the ball is just not in view because of how it's being held at the moment of greatest forward progress as Roethlisberger is contacted by the defender, pushing him backwards (back and to the right...back and to the right). In the absence of indisputable evidence from the replay, the official has to go with the ruling made on the field - hence the touchdown. Now, I'm a Seattle fan and I think in reality, the ball most likely didn't cross the plane, but given what the official had to work with, he made the right call.
Brett
I agree, but Seattle most definitely got screwed on just about every call made in the game.
They pretty much got robbed of one TD with a pretty flaky offensive "pass interference" call.
Then there was that bullet from near their 40 or so that would've been first and goal, except I recall another pretty flaky call put that one back to the start, which then resulted in a sack the next play, forcing a punt after that.
Then there was another call which was overturned on a challenge, when some ref thought the QB had fumbled the ball, when in fact he had been hit, and landed with both elbows before losing the ball.
Honestly, I think Seattle played a better game. I don't care about either team, it was honestly just pretty F-ed up that the Super Bowl had what really appeared to be a hefty bias against one team.