They’re blaming the trade war Trump started with China, but make no mistake, this can be traced back to origins with abrupt USAID cuts and contracts they broke with American farmers. I and others predicted this would be necessary.
How are those DOGE “savings” looking now?
US Weighs Farmer Bailout as China Threatens Retaliation
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said the administration is considering plans to offer assistance to farmers amid worries that the US-China trade war will have a disastrous effect on American agricultural producers.ground.news
10/10, great shitpost. You almost had me fooled.
Just to be clear, I am talking about the outcome (getting fired) not the actions (speaking out). With reference to their actions, I agree. Shut your mouth and submit your papers to get out.
NAL, but my understanding is that 99% of the GCM cases are DOA. The definition of contemptuous has a high bar.
I think it I’d important to remember that the current administration is threatening violence against one of our NATO allies in order to grab their territory.
For you and I, yes. For senior leaders it must (and should) be discussed with the administration in private meetings, not on a public forum.
Except it isn’t. The emperor is told his clothes are wonderful, beautiful, the best ever, and anyone saying anything contrary to that- privately or otherwise- is fired.
The treaty with NATO was ratified by the Senate and is now enforceable law within the United States, as per the Constitution. The idea of threatening our treaty partner with violence in order to grab their land…in accordance with the NATO treaty if they are attacked we are bound by our laws to come to their defense.
Because there's Constitional ambiguity about enforcing said treaty.
Wonder how that all worked out for him? Does his grift endure, or like Kyle Rittenhouse, who appears to be working at a local gun shop, was he discarded by the right wing punditry after the novelty wore off?