@Faded Float Coat easy now, your sanctimonious meter is pegging out. I think the JV nature of what Mike Walz did was just that, JV. And Dave makes a good point that POTUS may need to send a shot across the bow and let him, or others, go. But the whole WAR PLANS narrative on the left is comical, at best. Don't worry, I won't bother you with "whataboutism's" but like I said earlier in this string, I think a context and content discussion is worthy, without the "YOU SHOULD HAVE YOUR CLEARANCE PULLED !!!" Give me a fucking break . . . . .Again, @robav8r , I'm intrigued, does Bartstool Dave's commentary (that you shared here as "interesting") count as "moral outrage" or is it just commentary? See, I'm confused. Because Dave said a lot of things that folks here have also expressed. Which one is interesting and which one crosses your threshold?
Contrarianism isn't a virtue.
So, maybe we can go forward and just "talk" with one another here, share information and insights, maybe even a sea story or two. Maybe we can make the collective audience smarter, and more engaged on issues they know little about. You know, that whole leadership thing . . . . but without the constant barrage of arrogant, sarcastic barbs that ultimately turn everyone off. And yes, I can be as guilty as anyone here.
Sorry, forgot to add a few smiley emojis 🙂


Last edited: