Oh, I agree -- the design -- it was probably what they had to go with after we hammered all their plants into bonsai gardens --- I was thinking more of their "inclination" -- especially their Navy (their= "Jap Navy ", i.e., spell check suggestions: saps, naps, raps, taps, laps ... go figure) -- to use and appreciate the advantages of flying boats out over the vast expanses of the Pacific ....IMHO, the US-1 owes more to the Martin seaplane legacy than to the Emily flying boat
Oh, I agree -- the design -- it was probably what they had to go with after we hammered all their plants into bonsai gardens --- I was thinking more of their "inclination" -- especially their Navy (their= "Jap Navy ", i.e., spell check suggestions: saps, naps, raps, taps, laps ... go figure) -- to use and appreciate the advantages of flying boats out over the vast expanses of the Pacific ....
^ But so was the tortise.
Not too hard to see the lineage in the Shin Meiwa's of the Kawanishi company ... Kawanishi H8K "Emily" in this case ... those ol' girls have been around since the days prior to WW2 ... the Nips always had a fondness for seaplanes and floats ... a relatively "cheap" way to utilize the vast expanses of the Pacific and it's lagoons .... they always were quite advanced with using air and the Pacific.
Roger that ... got that ... wonder why they spelled it -- Shin Meiwa -- "Shin Maywa" in the article??? I guess that's what they company calls itself these days, but I've never seen that spelling ...Not sure if you were getting at it but ShinMaywa is the former Kawanishi company ....
Roger that ... got that ... wonder why they spelled it -- Shin Meiwa -- "Shin Maywa" in the article??? I guess that's what they company calls itself these days, but I've never seen that spelling ...
But then ... Mitsubishi is making a "comeback" ... hai ???
(continuing COD threadjack)Well designed, but ill-concieved???
... which is largely why the USN scuttled 'em off Hawaii.
ACTUALLY )) .... while several captured IJN submarines were sunk off Nagasaki and off the Goto's in the East China Sea west of Kyushu ---- the I-400, 401 (pictured in Eddie's post -- and what we're talking about) , I-201, and 203 (the last two were of interest as they were significantly faster than any USN submarines of the day) were transpac'ed to Hawaii by USN crews and sunk by the USN when they were no longer "needed" ..... off Kalaeloa (Long Point) ... better known as Barber's Point.....they were sunk off Japan, not HI....
But ill-conceived?? How do you figure?? They were certainly poorly employed and essentially became the IJN version of the German "milch cows" instead of fulfilling their original purpose .... as when conceived, killing the Panama Canal locks seemed like a great idea.
ACTUALLY )) .... while several captured IJN submarines were sunk off Nagasaki and off the Goto's in the East China Sea west of Kyushu ---- the I-400, 401 (pictured in Eddie's post -- and what we're talking about) , I-201, and 203 (the last two were of interest as they were significantly faster than any USN submarines of the day) were transpac'ed to Hawaii by USN crews and sunk by the USN when they were no longer "needed" ..... off Kalaeloa (Long Point) ... better known as Barber's Point.
A nice little story of I-400's saga .... The TransPacific Voyage of I-400
(COD threadjack continues .... )
Naaaaaa .... unfortunately, too deep.Interesting, and that makes sense. Why in the hell would we give up that kind of technology? Subs? There's no subs. We sank them in Japan. <Shifty eyes>
Short of actually researching it, do you know how far off they are? Seems like that would be a dive site if it was shallow enough.